public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Arun Bhanu <ab@arunbhanu.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] memory hotplug: include/linux/radix-tree.h:145 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:59:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292565541.2655.28.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101217054722.GG2253@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Le jeudi 16 décembre 2010 à 21:47 -0800, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:04:13AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > How about this?
> > Maybe Paul have better idea.
> > (It's apparently be word-wrapped.)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/radix-tree.h b/include/linux/radix-tree.h
> > index ab2baa5..135af1e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/radix-tree.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/radix-tree.h
> > @@ -146,6 +146,20 @@ static inline void *radix_tree_deref_slot(void **pslot)
> >  }
> > 
> >  /**
> > + * radix_tree_deref_slot_nocheck       - dereference a slot without RCU check
> > + * @pslot:     pointer to slot, returned by radix_tree_lookup_slot
> > + * Returns:    item that was stored in that slot with any direct pointer flag
> > + *             removed.
> > + *
> > + * This functions works like radix_tree_deref_slot except it doesn't check
> > + * RCU rule. Normally this funcion is used with update-side lock.
> > + * You should use this function very carefully.
> > + */
> > +static inline void *radix_tree_deref_slot_nocheck(void **pslot)
> > +{
> > +       return rcu_dereference_protected(*pslot, 1);
> 
> I suggest replacing the "1" with lockdep expressions for the locks
> that you say might be held:
> 
> 	return rcu_dereference_check(*pslot,
> 				     lockdep_is_held(&mapping->tree_lock));
> 

Yes, but point was also to use rcu_dereference_protected() here, not
rcu_dereference_check().



> This assumes that when you said "and" you meant both lock_page() and
> mapping->tree_lock.  Also you need to pass in the mapping, which
> should not be a problem given likely inlining.
> 
> If you meant that either mapping->tree_lock or page_lock() might be
> held, I suppose that the page_lock() state could be passed in, but
> perhaps better to take a general lockdep expression.
> 
> So, either or both?  ;-)
> 

Thanks


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-17  5:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-21 11:26 [BUG?] [Ext4] INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Arun Bhanu
2010-11-21 13:30 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-21 15:39   ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-21 17:37     ` Ted Ts'o
2010-11-22  0:38       ` Minchan Kim
2010-11-22  3:31         ` Milton Miller
2010-11-22  6:16           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-07 19:01             ` [BUG?] memory hotplug: include/linux/radix-tree.h:145 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Gerald Schaefer
2010-12-08  1:19               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-16 13:50                 ` Gerald Schaefer
2010-12-17  0:04                   ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-17  5:47                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17  5:59                       ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-12-17 15:08                       ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-17 16:03                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-17  8:39                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-17  9:28                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-12-17 15:22                         ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-17 15:13                       ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-17 16:01                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-23  7:16       ` [BUG?] [Ext4] INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1292565541.2655.28.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=ab@arunbhanu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=miltonm@bga.com \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox