linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: EUNBONG SONG <eunb.song@samsung.com>
To: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: EXT4 panic at jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() in 3.9+
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:53:27 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12945098.35291368438804981.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml07> (raw)



> Hi all,

> First of all I couldn't reproduce this regression in my sand box.  So
> the following speculation is only my guess.  I suspect that the commit
> (ae4647fb) isn't root cause.  It just uncover a potential bug that has
> been there for a long time.  I look at the code, and found two
> suspicious stuff in jbd2.  The first one is in do_get_write_access().
> In this function we forgot to lock bh state when we check b_jlist ==
> BJ_Shadow.  I generate a patch to fix it, and I really think it is the
> root cause.  Further, in __journal_remove_journal_head() we check
> b_jlist == BJ_None.  But, when this function is called, bh state won't
> be locked sometimes.  So I suspect this is why we hit a BUG in
> jbd2_journal_put_journal_head().  But I don't have a good solution to
> fix this until now because I don't know whether we need to lock bh state
> here, or maybe we should remove this assertation.
>
> So, generally, Tony, Eunbong, could you please try the following patch?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>                                                 - Zheng


Hi, I tested your patch. Unfortunately, the same problem was reproduced.
Thanks.

             reply	other threads:[~2013-05-13  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-13  9:53 EUNBONG SONG [this message]
2013-05-13 11:26 ` Re: Re: EXT4 panic at jbd2_journal_put_journal_head() in 3.9+ Zheng Liu
2013-05-13 12:07   ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-05-13 12:54     ` Eunbong Song
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-13  2:21 EUNBONG SONG
2013-05-13  3:11 ` Tony Luck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12945098.35291368438804981.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml07 \
    --to=eunb.song@samsung.com \
    --cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
    --cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).