From: amir73il@users.sourceforge.net
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, lczerner@redhat.com,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net>,
Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 24/36] ext4: snapshot journaled - bypass to save credits
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:07:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307459283-22130-25-git-send-email-amir73il@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307459283-22130-1-git-send-email-amir73il@users.sourceforge.net>
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net>
Don't journal COW bitmap indirect blocks to save journal credits.
On very few COW operations (i.e., first block group access after
snapshot take), there may be up to 3 extra blocks allocated for the
active snapshot (i.e., COW bitmap block and up to 2 indirect blocks).
Taking these 2 indorect blocks into account on every COW operation
would further increase the transaction's COW credits factor.
Instead, we choose to pay a small performance penalty on these few
COW bitmap operations and wait until they are synced to disk.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net>
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index d703a55..de40993 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -835,7 +835,8 @@ static int ext4_alloc_branch_cow(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
branch[n].bh = bh;
lock_buffer(bh);
BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "call get_create_access");
- err = ext4_journal_get_create_access(handle, bh);
+ if (!SNAPMAP_ISSYNC(flags))
+ err = ext4_journal_get_create_access(handle, bh);
if (err) {
/* Don't brelse(bh) here; it's done in
* ext4_journal_forget() below */
@@ -862,7 +863,21 @@ static int ext4_alloc_branch_cow(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
unlock_buffer(bh);
BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "call ext4_handle_dirty_metadata");
- err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, inode, bh);
+ /*
+ * When accessing a block group for the first time, the
+ * block bitmap is the first block to be copied to the
+ * snapshot. We don't want to reserve journal credits for
+ * the indirect blocks that map the bitmap copy (the COW
+ * bitmap), so instead of writing through the journal, we
+ * sync the indirect blocks directly to disk. Of course,
+ * this is not good for performance but it only happens once
+ * per snapshot/blockgroup.
+ */
+ if (SNAPMAP_ISSYNC(flags)) {
+ mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
+ sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
+ } else
+ err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, inode, bh);
if (err)
goto failed;
}
@@ -871,6 +886,9 @@ static int ext4_alloc_branch_cow(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
failed:
/* Allocation failed, free what we already allocated */
ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, NULL, new_blocks[0], 1, 0);
+ /* If we bypassed journal, we don't need to forget any block */
+ if (SNAPMAP_ISSYNC(flags))
+ n = 1;
for (i = 1; i <= n ; i++) {
/*
* branch[i].bh is newly allocated, so there is no
@@ -966,13 +984,18 @@ static int ext4_splice_branch_cow(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
err_out:
for (i = 1; i <= num; i++) {
+ int forget = EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET;
+
+ /* If we bypassed journal, we don't need to forget */
+ if (SNAPMAP_ISSYNC(flags))
+ forget = 0;
+
/*
* branch[i].bh is newly allocated, so there is no
* need to revoke the block, which is why we don't
* need to set EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_METADATA.
*/
- ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, where[i].bh, 0, 1,
- EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_FORGET);
+ ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, where[i].bh, 0, 1, forget);
}
if (SNAPMAP_ISMOVE(flags))
/* don't charge snapshot file owner if move failed */
--
1.7.4.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-07 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-07 15:07 [PATCH v1 00/30] Ext4 snapshots amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 01/36] ext4: EXT4 snapshots (Experimental) amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 02/36] ext4: snapshot debugging support amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 03/36] ext4: snapshot hooks - inside JBD hooks amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 04/36] ext4: snapshot hooks - block bitmap access amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 05/36] ext4: snapshot hooks - delete blocks amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 06/36] ext4: snapshot hooks - move data blocks amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 07/36] ext4: snapshot hooks - direct I/O amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 08/36] ext4: snapshot hooks - move extent file data blocks amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 09/36] ext4: snapshot file amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 10/36] ext4: snapshot file - read through to block device amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 11/36] ext4: snapshot file - permissions amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 12/36] ext4: snapshot file - store on disk amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 13/36] ext4: snapshot file - increase maximum file size limit to 16TB amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 14/36] ext4: snapshot block operations amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 15/36] ext4: snapshot block operation - copy blocks to snapshot amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 16/36] ext4: snapshot block operation - move " amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 17/36] ext4: snapshot block operation - copy block bitmap " amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 18/36] ext4: snapshot control amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 19/36] ext4: snapshot control - init new snapshot amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 20/36] ext4: snapshot control - fix " amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 21/36] ext4: snapshot control - reserve disk space for snapshot amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 22/36] ext4: snapshot journaled - increase transaction credits amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 23/36] ext4: snapshot journaled - implement journal_release_buffer() amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` amir73il [this message]
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 25/36] ext4: snapshot journaled - cache last COW tid in journal_head amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 26/36] ext4: snapshot journaled - trace COW/buffer credits amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 27/36] ext4: snapshot list support amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 28/36] ext4: snapshot list - read through to previous snapshot amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 29/36] ext4: snapshot race conditions - concurrent COW bitmap operations amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 30/36] ext4: snapshot race conditions - concurrent COW operations amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 31/36] ext4: snapshot race conditions - tracked reads amir73il
2011-06-07 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 32/36] ext4: snapshot exclude - the exclude bitmap amir73il
2011-06-07 15:08 ` [PATCH v1 33/36] ext4: snapshot cleanup amir73il
2011-06-07 15:08 ` [PATCH v1 34/36] ext4: snapshot cleanup - shrink deleted snapshots amir73il
2011-06-07 15:08 ` [PATCH v1 35/36] ext4: snapshot cleanup - merge shrunk snapshots amir73il
2011-06-07 15:08 ` [PATCH v1 36/36] ext4: snapshot rocompat - enable rw mount amir73il
2011-06-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 00/30] Ext4 snapshots Lukas Czerner
2011-06-07 16:31 ` Amir G.
2011-06-08 10:09 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-08 14:04 ` Amir G.
2011-06-08 14:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-06-08 15:01 ` Amir G.
2011-06-08 15:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-06-08 15:33 ` Amir G.
2011-06-08 15:38 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-08 15:59 ` Amir G.
2011-06-08 16:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-06-09 1:59 ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-06-09 3:18 ` Amir G.
2011-06-09 3:51 ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-06-09 6:50 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-09 7:57 ` Amir G.
2011-06-09 8:13 ` david
2011-06-09 10:06 ` Amir G.
2011-06-09 10:17 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-09 8:46 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-09 10:54 ` Amir G.
2011-06-09 12:59 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-10 7:06 ` Amir G.
2011-06-10 9:00 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-10 12:02 ` Amir G.
2011-06-13 9:56 ` Amir G.
2011-06-13 10:54 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-13 12:56 ` Amir G.
2011-06-13 13:11 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-13 13:26 ` Amir G.
2011-06-13 13:50 ` Joe Thornber
2011-06-10 22:51 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-06-11 1:09 ` Amir G.
2011-06-21 11:06 ` Amir G.
2011-06-21 15:45 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-06-22 6:38 ` Amir G.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1307459283-22130-25-git-send-email-amir73il@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=amir73il@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=amir73il@users.sf.net \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).