From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND] ext4: fix undefined behavior in ext4_fill_flex_info()
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:47:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1326152840-1188-1-git-send-email-xi.wang@gmail.com> (raw)
Commit 503358ae01b70ce6909d19dd01287093f6b6271c ("ext4: avoid divide by
zero when trying to mount a corrupted file system") fixes CVE-2009-4307
by performing a sanity check on s_log_groups_per_flex, since it can be
set to a bogus value by an attacker.
sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex = sbi->s_es->s_log_groups_per_flex;
groups_per_flex = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
if (groups_per_flex < 2) { ... }
This patch fixes two potential issues in the previous commit.
1) The sanity check might only work on architectures like PowerPC.
On x86, 5 bits are used for the shifting amount. That means, given a
large s_log_groups_per_flex value like 36, groups_per_flex = 1 << 36
is essentially 1 << 4 = 16, rather than 0. This will bypass the check,
leaving s_log_groups_per_flex and groups_per_flex inconsistent.
2) The sanity check relies on undefined behavior, i.e., oversized shift.
A standard-confirming C compiler could rewrite the check in unexpected
ways. Consider the following equivalent form, assuming groups_per_flex
is unsigned for simplicity.
groups_per_flex = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
if (groups_per_flex == 0 || groups_per_flex == 1) {
We compile the code snippet using Clang 3.0 and GCC 4.6. Clang will
completely optimize away the check groups_per_flex == 0, leaving the
patched code as vulnerable as the original. GCC keeps the check, but
there is no guarantee that future versions will do the same.
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
BTW, the patch does not limit s_log_groups_per_flex too much, so
groups_per_flex could be as large as 1 << 31. When calculating
flex_group_count, can
sbi->s_groups_count + groups_per_flex
overflow and cause any problem?
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 7 +++----
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 64e2529..ecea4c9 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -2005,17 +2005,16 @@ static int ext4_fill_flex_info(struct super_block *sb)
struct ext4_group_desc *gdp = NULL;
ext4_group_t flex_group_count;
ext4_group_t flex_group;
- int groups_per_flex = 0;
+ unsigned int groups_per_flex = 0;
size_t size;
int i;
sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex = sbi->s_es->s_log_groups_per_flex;
- groups_per_flex = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
next reply other threads:[~2012-01-09 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-09 23:47 Xi Wang [this message]
2012-01-10 16:54 ` [PATCH RESEND] ext4: fix undefined behavior in ext4_fill_flex_info() Ted Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1326152840-1188-1-git-send-email-xi.wang@gmail.com \
--to=xi.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).