From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.cz, wenqing.lz@taobao.com,
Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ext4: ext4_split_extent shoult take care about extent zeroout v3
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:07:39 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1361808463-25471-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> (raw)
When ext4_split_extent_at() ends up doing zeroout & conversion to
initialized instead of split & conversion, ext4_split_extent() gets
confused and can wrongly mark the extent back as uninitialized resulting in
end IO code getting confused from large unwritten extents and may result in
data loss.
The example of problematic behavior is:
lblk len lblk len
ext4_split_extent() (ex=[1000,30,uninit], map=[1010,10])
ext4_split_extent_at() (split [1000,30,uninit] at 1020)
ext4_ext_insert_extent() -> ENOSPC
ext4_ext_zeroout()
-> extent [1000,30] is now initialized
ext4_split_extent_at() (split [1000,30,init] at 1010,
MARK_UNINIT1 | MARK_UNINIT2)
-> extent is split and parts marked as uninitialized
Fix the problem by rechecking extent type after the first
ext4_split_extent_at() returns. None of split_flags can not be applied to
initialized extent so this patch also add BUG_ON to prevent similar issues
in future.
TESTCASE: https://github.com/dmonakhov/xfstests/commit/b8a55eb5ce28c6ff29e620ab090902fcd5833597
Changes since V2: Patch no longer depends on Jan's "disable-uninit-ext-mergring" patch.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 372b2cb..3bd3ca5 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -2943,6 +2943,10 @@ static int ext4_split_extent_at(handle_t *handle,
newblock = split - ee_block + ext4_ext_pblock(ex);
BUG_ON(split < ee_block || split >= (ee_block + ee_len));
+ BUG_ON(!ext4_ext_is_uninitialized(ex) &&
+ split_flag & (EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT |
+ EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNINIT1 |
+ EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNINIT2));
err = ext4_ext_get_access(handle, inode, path + depth);
if (err)
@@ -3061,19 +3065,25 @@ static int ext4_split_extent(handle_t *handle,
if (err)
goto out;
}
-
+ /*
+ * Update path is required because previous ext4_split_extent_at() may
+ * result in split of original leaf or extent zeroout.
+ */
ext4_ext_drop_refs(path);
path = ext4_ext_find_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, path);
if (IS_ERR(path))
return PTR_ERR(path);
+ depth = ext_depth(inode);
+ ex = path[depth].p_ext;
+ uninitialized = ext4_ext_is_uninitialized(ex);
+ split_flag1 = 0;
if (map->m_lblk >= ee_block) {
- split_flag1 = split_flag & (EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT |
- EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2);
- if (uninitialized)
+ split_flag1 = split_flag & EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2;
+ if (uninitialized) {
split_flag1 |= EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNINIT1;
- if (split_flag & EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNINIT2)
- split_flag1 |= EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNINIT2;
+ split_flag1 |= split_flag & (EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT | EXT4_EXT_MARK_UNINIT2);
+ }
err = ext4_split_extent_at(handle, inode, path,
map->m_lblk, split_flag1, flags);
if (err)
--
1.7.1
next reply other threads:[~2013-02-25 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-25 16:07 Dmitry Monakhov [this message]
2013-02-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] ext4: disable merging of uninitialized extents Dmitry Monakhov
2013-02-25 18:09 ` Jan Kara
2013-03-04 14:26 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] ext4: add warning to ext4_convert_unwritten_extents_endio Dmitry Monakhov
2013-02-25 18:08 ` Jan Kara
2013-03-04 14:00 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] ext4: remove unnecessary wait for extent conversion in ext4_fallocate() Dmitry Monakhov
2013-02-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] ext4: invalidate exntent-status-tree during extent_migration Dmitry Monakhov
2013-02-25 16:29 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-02-25 17:04 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-26 14:23 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix wrong m_len value after unwritten extent conversion (Re: [PATCH 5/5] ext4: invalidate...) Zheng Liu
2013-02-26 15:43 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-02-25 18:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] ext4: invalidate exntent-status-tree during extent_migration Jan Kara
2013-02-25 18:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] ext4: ext4_split_extent shoult take care about extent zeroout v3 Jan Kara
2013-03-04 5:58 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-03-04 6:37 ` Zheng Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1361808463-25471-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).