linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: imperfect FIEMAP results on btrfs
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 19:00:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367510414.32396.90.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)

Hi,

I have a rather extensive FIEMAP test which works fine on ext4 but fails
on btrfs. I've took a look at one of the failures, and simplified it to
the following:

1. create a 4KiB non-sparse file
2. truncate it to 8KiB
3. truncate it to 4KiB + 1 byte

IOW:

$ dd if=/dev/urandom of=file bs=4096 count=1
$ truncate -s 8192 file
$ truncate -s 4097 file

Let's assume that the FS block size is 4KiB, as it is returned the
FIGETBSZ ioctl. These actions result in:

1. the file will have only 1 block mapped on ext4
2. the file will have 2 blocks mapped on btrfs

IOW, on ext4:

$ stat file
  File: ‘file’
  Size: 4097            Blocks: 8          IO Block: 4096   regular file

and on btrfs

$ stat file
  File: ‘file’
  Size: 4097            Blocks: 16         IO Block: 4096   regular file

Notice 8 vs 16 blocks.

Interesting enough that just creating a 4KiB file and then truncating it
to 4097 bytes works as I expect in btrfs - results in a file with only
the first block mapped.

It looks like ext4 is "perfect" in detecting sparse 4KiB blocks while
btrfs sometimes maps seemingly sparse 4KiB blocks. Is this considered to
be a defect or this is fine since the FS does not probably give any
guarantees WRT mapped and unmapped blocks?

Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

             reply	other threads:[~2013-05-02 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-02 16:00 Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2013-05-02 16:08 ` imperfect FIEMAP results on btrfs Artem Bityutskiy
2013-05-02 23:31 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-03  5:57   ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1367510414.32396.90.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).