From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] jbd: use a single printk for jbd_debug() Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 12:21:05 -0700 Message-ID: <1375384865.2034.70.camel@joe-AO722> References: <1375383668-8072-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <1375383668-8072-5-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Kara , Andrew Morton , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Gortmaker Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1375383668-8072-5-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 15:01 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > Backport of jbd2 commit 169f1a2a87aae44034da4b9f81be1683d33de6d0 > ("jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug()") Hey Paul. > diff --git a/include/linux/jbd.h b/include/linux/jbd.h [] > @@ -56,16 +56,13 @@ > #define JBD_EXPENSIVE_CHECKING > extern ushort journal_enable_debug; > > -#define jbd_debug(n, f, a...) \ > - do { \ > - if ((n) <= journal_enable_debug) { \ > - printk (KERN_DEBUG "(%s, %d): %s: ", \ > - __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \ > - printk (f, ## a); \ > - } \ > - } while (0) > +void __jbd_debug(int level, const char *file, const char *func, > + unsigned int line, const char *fmt, ... > + > +#define jbd_debug(n, fmt, a...) \ > + __jbd_debug((n), __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__, (fmt), ##a) > #else > -#define jbd_debug(f, a...) /**/ > +#define jbd_debug(n, fmt, a...) /**/ > #endif It might have been (and may still be) simpler/better to use a single macro like: #define jbd_dbg(n, fmt, ...) \ do { \ if ((n) < journal_enable_debug) \ pr_debug(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ } while (0) and then use dynamic_debug to add the __func__, and __LINE__ when desired. echo -n 'module jbd +pfl' /control