From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Yan Zheng <ukernel@gmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Fix performance regression in writeback of random writes
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 21:40:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1378842006-15237-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
Linux Kernel Performance project guys have reported that commit 4e7ea81db5
introduces a performance regression for the following fio workload:
[global]
direct=0
ioengine=mmap
size=1500M
bs=4k
pre_read=1
numjobs=1
overwrite=1
loops=5
runtime=300
group_reporting
invalidate=0
directory=/mnt/
file_service_type=random:36
file_service_type=random:36
[job0]
startdelay=0
rw=randrw
filename=data0/f1:data0/f2
[job1]
startdelay=0
rw=randrw
filename=data0/f2:data0/f1
...
[job7]
startdelay=0
rw=randrw
filename=data0/f2:data0/f1
The culprit of the problem is that after the commit ext4_writepages()
are more aggressive in writing back pages. Thus we have less consecutive
dirty pages resulting in more seeking.
This increased aggressivity is caused by a bug in the condition
terminating ext4_writepages(). We start writing from the beginning of
the file even if we should have terminated ext4_writepages() because
wbc->nr_to_write <= 0.
After fixing the condition the throughput of the fio workload is about 20%
better than before writeback reorganization.
Reported-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index c79fd7d..7914c05 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2563,7 +2563,7 @@ retry:
break;
}
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
- if (!ret && !cycled) {
+ if (!ret && !cycled && wbc->nr_to_write > 0) {
cycled = 1;
mpd.last_page = writeback_index - 1;
mpd.first_page = 0;
--
1.8.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2013-09-10 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-10 19:40 Jan Kara [this message]
2013-09-11 9:45 ` [PATCH] ext4: Fix performance regression in writeback of random writes Bernd Schubert
2013-09-11 10:11 ` Jan Kara
2013-09-11 11:13 ` Bernd Schubert
2013-09-16 12:28 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1378842006-15237-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=ukernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).