linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: T Makphaibulchoke <tmac@hp.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: aswin@hp.com, aswin_proj@lists.hp.com, T Makphaibulchoke <tmac@hp.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] fs/ext4/namei.c: reducing contention on s_orphan_lock mmutex
Date: Wed,  2 Oct 2013 09:36:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380728219-60784-2-git-send-email-tmac@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380728219-60784-1-git-send-email-tmac@hp.com>

Instead of using a single per super block mutex, s_orphan_lock, to serialize
all orphan list updates, a separate mutex and spinlock are used to
protect the on disk and in memory orphan lists respecvitely.

At the same time, a per inode mutex is used to serialize orphan list
updates of a single inode.

Signed-off-by: T. Makphaibulchoke <tmac@hp.com>
---
 fs/ext4/namei.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
index 35f55a0..d7d3d0f 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -2554,12 +2554,24 @@ int ext4_orphan_add(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
 	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
 	struct ext4_iloc iloc;
 	int err = 0, rc;
+	struct ext4_inode_info *ext4_inode = EXT4_I(inode);
+	struct ext4_sb_info *ext4_sb = EXT4_SB(sb);
+	struct mutex *inode_orphan_mutex;
+	spinlock_t *orphan_lock;
+	struct mutex *ondisk_orphan_mutex;
+	struct list_head *prev;
+	unsigned int next_inum;
+	struct inode *next_inode;
 
-	if (!EXT4_SB(sb)->s_journal)
+	if (ext4_sb->s_journal)
 		return 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_orphan_lock);
-	if (!list_empty(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan))
+	inode_orphan_mutex = &ext4_inode->i_orphan_mutex;
+	orphan_lock = &ext4_sb->s_orphan_lock;
+	ondisk_orphan_mutex = &ext4_sb->s_ondisk_orphan_lock;
+	mutex_lock(inode_orphan_mutex);
+	prev = ext4_inode->i_orphan.prev;
+	if (prev != &ext4_inode->i_orphan)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
 	/*
@@ -2579,17 +2591,28 @@ int ext4_orphan_add(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
 	err = ext4_reserve_inode_write(handle, inode, &iloc);
 	if (err)
 		goto out_unlock;
+	mutex_lock(ondisk_orphan_mutex);
 	/*
 	 * Due to previous errors inode may be already a part of on-disk
 	 * orphan list. If so skip on-disk list modification.
 	 */
 	if (NEXT_ORPHAN(inode) && NEXT_ORPHAN(inode) <=
-		(le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_inodes_count)))
+		(le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_inodes_count))) {
+			mutex_unlock(ondisk_orphan_mutex);
 			goto mem_insert;
+	}
 
 	/* Insert this inode at the head of the on-disk orphan list... */
-	NEXT_ORPHAN(inode) = le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_last_orphan);
-	EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_last_orphan = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_ino);
+	next_inum = le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_last_orphan);
+	NEXT_ORPHAN(inode) = next_inum;
+	next_inode = ilookup(sb, next_inum);
+	if (next_inode)
+		EXT4_I(next_inode)->i_prev_orphan = inode->i_ino;
+	ext4_sb->s_es->s_last_orphan = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_ino);
+	ext4_inode->i_prev_orphan = 0;
+	mutex_unlock(ondisk_orphan_mutex);
+	if (next_inode)
+		iput(next_inode);
 	err = ext4_handle_dirty_super(handle, sb);
 	rc = ext4_mark_iloc_dirty(handle, inode, &iloc);
 	if (!err)
@@ -2604,14 +2627,17 @@ int ext4_orphan_add(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
 	 * This is safe: on error we're going to ignore the orphan list
 	 * anyway on the next recovery. */
 mem_insert:
-	if (!err)
-		list_add(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan, &EXT4_SB(sb)->s_orphan);
+	if (!err) {
+		spin_lock(orphan_lock);
+		list_add(&ext4_inode->i_orphan, &ext4_sb->s_orphan);
+		spin_unlock(orphan_lock);
+	}
 
 	jbd_debug(4, "superblock will point to %lu\n", inode->i_ino);
 	jbd_debug(4, "orphan inode %lu will point to %d\n",
 			inode->i_ino, NEXT_ORPHAN(inode));
 out_unlock:
-	mutex_unlock(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_orphan_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(inode_orphan_mutex);
 	ext4_std_error(inode->i_sb, err);
 	return err;
 }
@@ -2624,71 +2650,106 @@ int ext4_orphan_del(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
 {
 	struct list_head *prev;
 	struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
-	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi;
+	struct inode *i_next = NULL;
+	struct inode *i_prev = NULL;
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb);
 	__u32 ino_next;
+	unsigned int ino_prev;
 	struct ext4_iloc iloc;
 	int err = 0;
+	struct mutex *inode_orphan_mutex;
+	spinlock_t *orphan_lock;
+	struct mutex *ondisk_orphan_mutex;
 
-	if ((!EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal) &&
-	    !(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_mount_state & EXT4_ORPHAN_FS))
+	if ((!sbi->s_journal) &&
+	    !(sbi->s_mount_state & EXT4_ORPHAN_FS))
 		return 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_orphan_lock);
-	if (list_empty(&ei->i_orphan))
-		goto out;
-
-	ino_next = NEXT_ORPHAN(inode);
+	inode_orphan_mutex = &ei->i_orphan_mutex;
+	orphan_lock = &sbi->s_orphan_lock;
+	ondisk_orphan_mutex = &sbi->s_ondisk_orphan_lock;
+	mutex_lock(inode_orphan_mutex);
 	prev = ei->i_orphan.prev;
-	sbi = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb);
+	if (prev == &ei->i_orphan) {
+		mutex_unlock(inode_orphan_mutex);
+		return err;
+	}
 
 	jbd_debug(4, "remove inode %lu from orphan list\n", inode->i_ino);
 
+	spin_lock(orphan_lock);
 	list_del_init(&ei->i_orphan);
+	spin_unlock(orphan_lock);
 
 	/* If we're on an error path, we may not have a valid
 	 * transaction handle with which to update the orphan list on
 	 * disk, but we still need to remove the inode from the linked
 	 * list in memory. */
-	if (!handle)
-		goto out;
+	if (!handle) {
+		mutex_unlock(inode_orphan_mutex);
+		return err;
+	}
 
 	err = ext4_reserve_inode_write(handle, inode, &iloc);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		mutex_unlock(inode_orphan_mutex);
 		goto out_err;
+	}
 
-	if (prev == &sbi->s_orphan) {
+	mutex_lock(ondisk_orphan_mutex);
+	ino_next = NEXT_ORPHAN(inode);
+	if (ino_next > 0) {
+		i_next = ilookup(inode->i_sb, ino_next);
+		assert(i_next);
+	}
+	ino_prev = ei->i_prev_orphan;
+	if (!ino_prev) {
 		jbd_debug(4, "superblock will point to %u\n", ino_next);
 		BUFFER_TRACE(sbi->s_sbh, "get_write_access");
 		err = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, sbi->s_sbh);
-		if (err)
-			goto out_brelse;
-		sbi->s_es->s_last_orphan = cpu_to_le32(ino_next);
-		err = ext4_handle_dirty_super(handle, inode->i_sb);
+		if (!err) {
+			sbi->s_es->s_last_orphan = cpu_to_le32(ino_next);
+			if (i_next)
+				EXT4_I(i_next)->i_prev_orphan = 0;
+		}
+		mutex_unlock(ondisk_orphan_mutex);
+		if (!err)
+			err = ext4_handle_dirty_super(handle, inode->i_sb);
 	} else {
 		struct ext4_iloc iloc2;
-		struct inode *i_prev =
-			&list_entry(prev, struct ext4_inode_info, i_orphan)->vfs_inode;
-
-		jbd_debug(4, "orphan inode %lu will point to %u\n",
-			  i_prev->i_ino, ino_next);
-		err = ext4_reserve_inode_write(handle, i_prev, &iloc2);
-		if (err)
-			goto out_brelse;
-		NEXT_ORPHAN(i_prev) = ino_next;
-		err = ext4_mark_iloc_dirty(handle, i_prev, &iloc2);
+		i_prev = ilookup(inode->i_sb, ino_prev);
+
+		assert(i_prev);
+		if (i_prev) {
+			jbd_debug(4, "orphan inode %lu will point to %u\n",
+				i_prev->i_ino, ino_next);
+			err = ext4_reserve_inode_write(handle, i_prev, &iloc2);
+		} else
+			err = -ENOENT;
+		if (!err) {
+			NEXT_ORPHAN(i_prev) = ino_next;
+			if (i_next)
+				EXT4_I(i_next)->i_prev_orphan = ino_prev;
+		}
+		mutex_unlock(ondisk_orphan_mutex);
+		if (i_prev && !err)
+			err = ext4_mark_iloc_dirty(handle, i_prev, &iloc2);
 	}
 	if (err)
 		goto out_brelse;
 	NEXT_ORPHAN(inode) = 0;
+	mutex_unlock(inode_orphan_mutex);
 	err = ext4_mark_iloc_dirty(handle, inode, &iloc);
-
 out_err:
+	if (i_next)
+		iput(i_next);
+	if (i_prev)
+		iput(i_prev);
 	ext4_std_error(inode->i_sb, err);
-out:
-	mutex_unlock(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_orphan_lock);
 	return err;
 
 out_brelse:
+	mutex_unlock(inode_orphan_mutex);
 	brelse(iloc.bh);
 	goto out_err;
 }
-- 
1.7.11.3

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-02 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-02 15:36 [PATCH 1/2] fs/ext4: adding and initalizing new members of ext4_inode_info and ext4_sb_info T Makphaibulchoke
2013-10-02 15:36 ` T Makphaibulchoke [this message]
2013-10-03  2:05   ` [PATCH 2/2] fs/ext4/namei.c: reducing contention on s_orphan_lock mmutex Zheng Liu
2013-10-03  8:31     ` Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2013-10-04  0:41   ` Andreas Dilger
2013-10-03 23:08     ` Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2013-10-04  0:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs/ext4: adding and initalizing new members of ext4_inode_info and ext4_sb_info Andreas Dilger
2013-10-03 23:14   ` Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1380728219-60784-2-git-send-email-tmac@hp.com \
    --to=tmac@hp.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=aswin@hp.com \
    --cc=aswin_proj@lists.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).