From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Eryu Guan" <guaneryu@gmail.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 21:27:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382275647-4616-1-git-send-email-guaneryu@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382002073-27862-1-git-send-email-guaneryu@gmail.com>
A corrupted ext4 may have out of order leaf extents, i.e.
extent: lblk 0--1023, len 1024, pblk 9217, flags: LEAF UNINIT
extent: lblk 1000--2047, len 1024, pblk 10241, flags: LEAF UNINIT
^^^^ overlap with previous extent
Reading such extent could hit BUG_ON() in ext4_es_cache_extent().
BUG_ON(end < lblk);
The problem is that __read_extent_tree_block() tries to cache holes as
well but assumes 'lblk' is greater than 'prev' and passes underflowed
length to ext4_es_cache_extent(). Fix it by checking for overlapping
extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries().
I hit this when fuzz testing ext4, and am able to reproduce it by
modifying the on-disk extent by hand.
Ran xfstests on patched ext4 and no regression.
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
---
Hi,
My second try to find and report the corruption instead of hiding it,
how about this one?
Thanks!
Eryu
fs/ext4/extents.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index c9ebcb9..855b11d 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -387,11 +387,21 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent_entries(struct inode *inode,
if (depth == 0) {
/* leaf entries */
struct ext4_extent *ext = EXT_FIRST_EXTENT(eh);
+ ext4_lblk_t block = 0;
+ ext4_lblk_t prev = 0;
+ int len = 0;
while (entries) {
if (!ext4_valid_extent(inode, ext))
return 0;
+
+ /* Check for overlapping extents */
+ block = le32_to_cpu(ext->ee_block);
+ len = ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext);
+ if ((block <= prev) && prev)
+ return 0;
ext++;
entries--;
+ prev = block + len - 1;
}
} else {
struct ext4_extent_idx *ext_idx = EXT_FIRST_INDEX(eh);
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-20 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-17 9:27 [PATCH] ext4: don't cache out of order extents Eryu Guan
2013-10-17 13:44 ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-10-17 14:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-10-17 15:22 ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-10-17 15:58 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-10-17 15:06 ` Eryu Guan
2013-10-20 13:27 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2013-10-21 11:59 ` [PATCH v2] ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries() Eryu Guan
2013-10-21 12:47 ` Eryu Guan
2013-10-21 16:06 ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-10-22 18:40 ` Eryu Guan
2013-12-04 2:36 ` [PATCH v3] " Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1382275647-4616-1-git-send-email-guaneryu@gmail.com \
--to=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).