From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
EXT4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/11] rbtree: postorder iteration: fix, add tests, and use in various places
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 17:42:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1383788572-25938-1-git-send-email-cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
New in v2:
1: Jan Kara's fix for rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() for when gcc tries to optimize it.
2,3: test the above mentioned macro and reorder the test struct to catch anther class of errors.
Unchanged from v1:
4-11: use the postorder_for_each() in various locations.
--
Cody P Schafer (10):
rbtree/test: move rb_node to the middle of the test struct
rbtree/test: test rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe()
net ipset: use rbtree postorder iteration instead of opencoding
trace/trace_stat: use rbtree postorder iteration helper instead of
opencoding
fs/ubifs: use rbtree postorder iteration helper instead of opencoding
fs/ext4: use rbtree postorder iteration helper instead of opencoding
fs/jffs2: use rbtree postorder iteration helper instead of opencoding
fs/ext3: use rbtree postorder iteration helper instead of opencoding
mtd/ubi: use rbtree postorder iteration helper instead of opencoding
sh/dwarf: use rbtree postorder iteration helper instead of solution
using repeated rb_erase()
Jan Kara (1):
rbtree: Fix rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() iterator
arch/sh/kernel/dwarf.c | 18 +++--------
drivers/mtd/ubi/attach.c | 49 +++++-------------------------
drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c | 25 ++-------------
fs/ext3/dir.c | 36 +++-------------------
fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 33 +++-----------------
fs/ext4/dir.c | 35 +++------------------
fs/jffs2/nodelist.c | 28 ++---------------
fs/jffs2/readinode.c | 26 ++--------------
fs/ubifs/debug.c | 22 ++------------
fs/ubifs/log.c | 21 ++-----------
fs/ubifs/orphan.c | 21 ++-----------
fs/ubifs/recovery.c | 21 ++-----------
fs/ubifs/super.c | 24 +++------------
fs/ubifs/tnc.c | 22 ++------------
include/linux/rbtree.h | 16 +++++-----
kernel/trace/trace_stat.c | 42 ++++---------------------
lib/rbtree_test.c | 13 +++++++-
net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_hash_netiface.c | 27 +++-------------
18 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 398 deletions(-)
--
1.8.4.2
next reply other threads:[~2013-11-07 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-07 1:42 Cody P Schafer [this message]
2013-11-07 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] rbtree: Fix rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() iterator Cody P Schafer
2013-11-07 11:51 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-07 18:59 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-11-07 21:38 ` Andrew Morton
2013-11-07 21:58 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-11-07 22:14 ` Jan Kara
2013-11-07 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] rbtree/test: move rb_node to the middle of the test struct Cody P Schafer
2013-11-07 11:52 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-07 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] rbtree/test: test rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() Cody P Schafer
2013-11-07 11:54 ` Michel Lespinasse
2013-11-07 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] net ipset: use rbtree postorder iteration instead of opencoding Cody P Schafer
2013-11-07 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] trace/trace_stat: use rbtree postorder iteration helper " Cody P Schafer
2013-11-07 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] fs/ubifs: " Cody P Schafer
2013-11-07 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] fs/ext4: " Cody P Schafer
2013-11-07 9:28 ` Jan Kara
2013-11-07 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] fs/jffs2: " Cody P Schafer
2013-11-07 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] fs/ext3: " Cody P Schafer
2013-11-07 8:17 ` Jan Kara
2013-11-07 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] mtd/ubi: " Cody P Schafer
2013-11-07 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] sh/dwarf: use rbtree postorder iteration helper instead of solution using repeated rb_erase() Cody P Schafer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1383788572-25938-1-git-send-email-cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).