From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] add support for a lazytime mount option
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:59:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1416599964-21892-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> (raw)
This is an updated version of what had originally been an
ext4-specific patch which significantly improves performance by lazily
writing timestamp updates (and in particular, mtime updates) to disk.
The in-memory timestamps are always correct, but they are only written
to disk when required for correctness.
This provides a huge performance boost for ext4 due to how it handles
journalling, but it's valuable for all file systems running on flash
storage or drive-managed SMR disks by reducing the metadata write
load. So upon request, I've moved the functionality to the VFS layer.
Once the /sbin/mount program adds support for MS_LAZYTIME, all file
systems should be able to benefit from this optimization.
There is still an ext4-specific optimization, which may be applicable
for other file systems which store more than one inode in a block, but
it will require file system specific code. It is purely optional,
however.
Please note the changes to update_time() and the new write_time() inode
operations functions, which impact btrfs and xfs. The changes are
fairly simple, but I would appreciate confirmation from the btrfs and
xfs teams that I got things right. Thanks!!
Theodore Ts'o (4):
fs: split update_time() into update_time() and write_time()
vfs: add support for a lazytime mount option
vfs: don't let the dirty time inodes get more than a day stale
ext4: add support for a lazytime mount option
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 10 ++++++
fs/ext4/inode.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
fs/ext4/super.c | 9 +++++
fs/fs-writeback.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++-
fs/inode.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
fs/proc_namespace.c | 1 +
fs/sync.c | 7 ++++
fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 39 +++++++++-------------
include/linux/fs.h | 5 +++
include/uapi/linux/fs.h | 1 +
10 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
--
2.1.0
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2014-11-21 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-21 19:59 Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2014-11-21 19:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] fs: split update_time() into update_time() and write_time() Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-21 20:08 ` Chris Mason
2014-11-21 21:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-24 16:38 ` David Sterba
2014-11-24 17:22 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-24 18:09 ` David Sterba
2014-11-24 15:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-24 15:56 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-24 17:34 ` David Sterba
2014-11-25 15:51 ` David Sterba
2014-11-25 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-21 19:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] vfs: add support for a lazytime mount option Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-25 1:52 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-25 4:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-25 15:32 ` Boaz Harrosh
2014-11-25 17:19 ` Jan Kara
2014-11-25 17:57 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-25 20:18 ` Jan Kara
2014-11-25 17:30 ` Jan Kara
2014-11-25 19:26 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-26 0:24 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-21 19:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] vfs: don't let the dirty time inodes get more than a day stale Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-21 20:19 ` Andreas Dilger
2014-11-21 21:36 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-21 23:09 ` Andreas Dilger
2014-11-25 1:53 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-25 4:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-25 23:48 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-26 10:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-26 22:39 ` Dave Chinner
2014-11-25 17:31 ` Jan Kara
2014-11-21 19:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] ext4: add support for a lazytime mount option Theodore Ts'o
2014-11-25 17:34 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1416599964-21892-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).