linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix reference counting bug on block allocation error
Date: Wed,  6 Jul 2016 15:57:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467813452-26763-1-git-send-email-vegard.nossum@oracle.com> (raw)

If we hit this error when mounted with errors=continue or
errors=remount-ro:

    EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used:2940: comm ext4.exe: Allocating blocks 5090-6081 which overlap fs metadata

then ext4_mb_new_blocks() will call ext4_mb_release_context() and try to
continue. However, ext4_mb_release_context() is the wrong thing to call
here since we are still actually using the allocation context.

Instead, handle it the same way that we handle other errors, except that
we retry the allocation instead of immediately returning an error (if we
were mounted with errors=continue, then ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used()
should have fixed the original error and will either succeed or give a
different error; if we were mounted with errors=remount-ro, then it will
not be able to fix the original error and will raise a different error).

Fixes: 8556e8f3b6 ("ext4: Don't allow new groups to be added during block allocation")
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index c1ab3ec..0370f76 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -4514,11 +4514,7 @@ repeat:
 	if (likely(ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_FOUND)) {
 		*errp = ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(ac, handle, reserv_clstrs);
 		if (*errp == -EAGAIN) {
-			/*
-			 * drop the reference that we took
-			 * in ext4_mb_use_best_found
-			 */
-			ext4_mb_release_context(ac);
+			ext4_discard_allocated_blocks(ac);
 			ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group = 0;
 			ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start = 0;
 			ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len = 0;
-- 
1.9.1


             reply	other threads:[~2016-07-06 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-06 13:57 Vegard Nossum [this message]
2016-07-07 11:21 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix reference counting bug on block allocation error Vegard Nossum
2016-07-15  3:01   ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1467813452-26763-1-git-send-email-vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
    --to=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).