From: Joe Richey <joerichey94@gmail.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com>,
Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] misc: fixed error handling in e4crypt
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 16:52:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491238370-30906-1-git-send-email-joerichey94@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
Due to some interesting behaviour in keyctl (as described in the
comments), we use KEYCTL_GET_KEYRING_ID to translate the special value
of KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING to a real keyring id. However, how we
currently do this is flawed in two ways.
First, if KEYCTL_GET_KEYRING_ID fails, we don't detect it as it returns
-1 and zero is used for an error value in get_keyring_id. Second, if the
user specifies "-k @s" the translation never runs and the undesireable
behavior occurs.
These are both fixed by doing the translation outside of get_keyring_id.
Signed-off-by: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
---
misc/e4crypt.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/misc/e4crypt.c b/misc/e4crypt.c
index 04faca3..600d0b7 100644
--- a/misc/e4crypt.c
+++ b/misc/e4crypt.c
@@ -507,24 +507,12 @@ static int get_keyring_id(const char *keyring)
/*
* If no keyring is specified, by default use either the user
- * session key ring or the session keyring. Fetching the
+ * session keyring or the session keyring. Fetching the
* session keyring will return the user session keyring if no
* session keyring has been set.
- *
- * We need to do this instead of simply adding the key to
- * KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING since trying to add a key to a
- * session keyring that does not yet exist will cause the
- * kernel to create a session keyring --- which wil then get
- * garbage collected as soon as e4crypt exits.
- *
- * The fact that the keyctl system call and the add_key system
- * call treats KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING differently when a
- * session keyring does not exist is very unfortunate and
- * confusing, but so it goes...
*/
if (keyring == NULL)
- return keyctl(KEYCTL_GET_KEYRING_ID,
- KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING, 0);
+ return KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING;
for (x = 0; x < (sizeof(keyrings) / sizeof(keyrings[0])); ++x) {
if (strcmp(keyring, keyrings[x].name) == 0) {
return keyrings[x].code;
@@ -585,6 +573,27 @@ static void insert_key_into_keyring(const char *keyring, struct salt *salt)
key.mode = EXT4_ENCRYPTION_MODE_AES_256_XTS;
memcpy(key.raw, salt->key, EXT4_MAX_KEY_SIZE);
key.size = EXT4_MAX_KEY_SIZE;
+
+ /*
+ * We need to do this instead of simply adding the key to
+ * KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING since trying to add a key to a
+ * session keyring that does not yet exist will cause the
+ * kernel to create a session keyring --- which wil then get
+ * garbage collected as soon as e4crypt exits.
+ *
+ * The fact that the keyctl system call and the add_key system
+ * call treats KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING differently when a
+ * session keyring does not exist is very unfortunate and
+ * confusing, but so it goes...
+ */
+ if (keyring_id == KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING) {
+ keyring_id = keyctl(KEYCTL_GET_KEYRING_ID, keyring_id, 0);
+ if (keyring_id < 0) {
+ printf("Error getting session keyring ID: %s\n",
+ strerror(errno));
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ }
rc = add_key(EXT2FS_KEY_TYPE_LOGON, key_ref_full, (void *)&key,
sizeof(key), keyring_id);
if (rc == -1) {
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-04-03 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-03 16:52 Joe Richey [this message]
2017-04-13 15:44 ` e4crypt: fix error handling for KEYCTL_GET_KEYRING_ID Theodore Ts'o
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-20 20:34 [PATCH] misc: fixed error handling in e4crypt Joe Richey
2017-04-01 16:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-04-03 16:52 ` Joseph Richey
2017-03-18 0:31 Joe Richey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1491238370-30906-1-git-send-email-joerichey94@gmail.com \
--to=joerichey94@gmail.com \
--cc=joerichey@google.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhalcrow@google.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).