Re: [PATCH v7 00/22] fs: enhanced writeback error reporting with errseq_t (pile #1)

[Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>]

On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 09:25 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:23:46 -0400 Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > If there are no major objections to this set, I'd like to have
> > linux-next start picking it up to get some wider testing. What's the
> > right vehicle for this, given that it touches stuff all over the tree?
> > 
> > I can see 3 potential options:
> > 
> > 1) I could just pull these into the branch that Stephen is already
> > picking up for file-locks in my tree
> > 
> > 2) I could put them into a new branch, and have Stephen pull that one in
> > addition to the file-locks branch
> > 
> > 3) It could go in via someone else's tree entirely (Andrew or Al's
> > maybe?)
> > 
> > I'm fine with any of these. Anyone have thoughts?
> 
> Given that this is a one off development, either 1 or 3 (in Al's tree)
> would be fine.  2 is a possibility (but people forget to ask me to
> remove one shot trees :-()
> 

Ok -- yeah, I'd probably be one of those people who forget too...

In that case, I'll plan to go ahead and just merge these into my
linux-next branch. That's easier than bugging others for it. Hopefully
we won't have a lot in the way of merge conflicts.

I'll see about getting this into branch later today, and hopefully we
can get it into linux-next for tomorrow.

Thanks!
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>