From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu.cn@gmail.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 5/8] ext4: update ext4_data_block_valid related comments
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 23:58:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1604764698-4269-5-git-send-email-brookxu@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1604764698-4269-1-git-send-email-brookxu@tencent.com>
From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>
Since ext4_data_block_valid() has been renamed to ext4_inode_block_valid(),
the related comments need to be updated.
Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
---
fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
index 37025e3..07e9dc3 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static void ext4_destroy_system_zone(struct rcu_head *rcu)
*
* The update of system_blks pointer in this function is protected by
* sb->s_umount semaphore. However we have to be careful as we can be
- * racing with ext4_data_block_valid() calls reading system_blks rbtree
+ * racing with ext4_inode_block_valid() calls reading system_blks rbtree
* protected only by RCU. That's why we first build the rbtree and then
* swap it in place.
*/
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb)
/*
* System blks rbtree complete, announce it once to prevent racing
- * with ext4_data_block_valid() accessing the rbtree at the same
+ * with ext4_inode_block_valid() accessing the rbtree at the same
* time.
*/
rcu_assign_pointer(sbi->s_system_blks, system_blks);
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb)
*
* The update of system_blks pointer in this function is protected by
* sb->s_umount semaphore. However we have to be careful as we can be
- * racing with ext4_data_block_valid() calls reading system_blks rbtree
+ * racing with ext4_inode_block_valid() calls reading system_blks rbtree
* protected only by RCU. So we first clear the system_blks pointer and
* then free the rbtree only after RCU grace period expires.
*/
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-07 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-07 15:58 [PATCH RESEND 1/8] ext4: use ext4_assert() to replace J_ASSERT() Chunguang Xu
2020-11-07 15:58 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/8] ext4: remove redundant mb_regenerate_buddy() Chunguang Xu
2020-12-03 14:42 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-11-07 15:58 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/8] ext4: simplify the code of mb_find_order_for_block Chunguang Xu
2020-12-03 14:43 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-11-07 15:58 ` [PATCH RESEND 4/8] ext4: add the gdt block of meta_bg to system_zone Chunguang Xu
2020-12-03 15:08 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-12-04 1:26 ` brookxu
2020-12-09 4:34 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-12-09 11:48 ` brookxu
2020-12-09 19:39 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-12-10 11:00 ` brookxu
2020-12-15 1:14 ` brookxu
2020-12-15 20:13 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-12-17 16:01 ` Andreas Dilger
2020-12-04 1:29 ` brookxu
2020-11-07 15:58 ` Chunguang Xu [this message]
2020-12-09 19:11 ` [PATCH RESEND 5/8] ext4: update ext4_data_block_valid related comments Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-11-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] ext4: add a helper function to validate metadata block Chunguang Xu
2020-12-09 4:55 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-12-09 12:12 ` brookxu
2020-11-07 15:58 ` [PATCH RESEND 7/8] ext4: delete invalid code inside ext4_xattr_block_set() Chunguang Xu
2020-12-09 19:24 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-11-07 15:58 ` [PATCH RESEND 8/8] ext4: fix a memory leak of ext4_free_data Chunguang Xu
2020-12-09 19:29 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-12-03 14:38 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/8] ext4: use ext4_assert() to replace J_ASSERT() Theodore Y. Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1604764698-4269-5-git-send-email-brookxu@tencent.com \
--to=brookxu.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).