From: Mikhail Morfikov <mmorfikov@gmail.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is it safe to use the bigalloc feature in the case of ext4 filesystem?
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:57:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1aa38330-eaed-ab37-b941-203d970a7727@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YQLsl7s/GcgMGi47@mit.edu>
I have a question concerning the *hugefiles* parameters. When a
filesystems is created using the hugefiles stanza, it also creates
lots of chunk-* files inside of the /storage/ dir. You say that it
guarantees the huge files to be 100% contiguous. But if I create
the filesystem with the preallocated files that consume the whole
drive, how am I suppose to use that drive? :) Are the files only
temporary, and should they be removed once the filesystem is
"ready"? What's the purpose of such options? Do they affect the
EXT4 metadata in some way? I mean, what's the change compared to
not using the options?
Also I have a question concerning the hugefiles stanza
itself -- it's missing the bigalloc feature, should it be there?
On 29/07/2021 19.59, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>...
> If you see the hugefile and hugefiles stanzas below, that's an example
> of one way bigalloc has gotten a fair amount of use. In this use case
> mke2fs has pre-allocated the huge data files guaranteeing that they
> will be 100% contiguous. We're using a 32k cluster becuase there are
> some metadata files where better allocation efficiencies is desired.
>
>...
>
> hugefiles = {
> features = extent,huge_file,flex_bg,uninit_bg,dir_nlink,extra_isize,^resize_inode,sparse_super2
> hash_alg = half_md4
> reserved_ratio = 0.0
> num_backup_sb = 0
> packed_meta_blocks = 1
> make_hugefiles = 1
> inode_ratio = 4194304
> hugefiles_dir = /storage
> hugefiles_name = chunk-
> hugefiles_digits = 5
> hugefiles_size = 4G
> hugefiles_align = 256M
> hugefiles_align_disk = true
> zero_hugefiles = false
> flex_bg_size = 262144
> }
>
> hugefile = {
> features = extent,huge_file,bigalloc,flex_bg,uninit_bg,dir_nlink,extra_isize,^resize_inode,sparse_super2
> cluster_size = 32768
> hash_alg = half_md4
> reserved_ratio = 0.0
> num_backup_sb = 0
> packed_meta_blocks = 1
> make_hugefiles = 1
> inode_ratio = 4194304
> hugefiles_dir = /storage
> hugefiles_name = huge-file
> hugefiles_digits = 0
> hugefiles_size = 0
> hugefiles_align = 256M
> hugefiles_align_disk = true
> num_hugefiles = 1
> zero_hugefiles = false
> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-30 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-23 15:30 Is it safe to use the bigalloc feature in the case of ext4 filesystem? Mikhail Morfikov
2021-07-27 6:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2021-07-27 23:01 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-07-28 9:36 ` Mikhail Morfikov
2021-07-29 17:59 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-07-29 18:32 ` Mikhail Morfikov
2021-07-30 13:57 ` Mikhail Morfikov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1aa38330-eaed-ab37-b941-203d970a7727@gmail.com \
--to=mmorfikov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).