From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Nikolai Joukov <kolya@cs.sunysb.edu>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Secure Deletion and Trash-Bin Support for Ext4
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:11:00 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061206091100.GA33919298@melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.53.0612051049200.27677@compserv1>
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 11:41:28AM -0500, Nikolai Joukov wrote:
> > > As we promised on the linux-ext4 list on October 31, here is the patch
> > > that adds secure deletion via a trash-bin functionality for ext4. It is a
> > > compromise solution that combines secure deletion with the trash-bin support
> > > (the latter had been requested by even more people than the former :-).
> >
> > Given that almost all of the code for this uses vfs interfaces and
> > only a couple of simple filesystem hooks, is there any reason for
> > this being ext4 specific? i.e. why aren't you hooking the vfs layer
> > so we get a single undelete/secure delete implementation for all
> > filesystems?
>
> You are right. Actually, we mentioned it as a benefit number 4 of this
> approach in the original post. Most of the code is not
> file-system--specific and can be used by any other (all other?) file
> system(s). The only complication is that only ext2/3/4 and reiser file
> systems already support the per-file secure deletion and undelete
> attributes.
They are defined but unused in 2.6.19, right? I can't see anywhere
in the 2.6.19 ext2/3/4/reiser trees that actually those flags,
including setting and retrieving them from disk. JFS i can see
sets, clears and retreives them, but not the fielsystems you
mention. Though I might just be blind..... ;)
If all we need to add to XFS is support for those flags, then XFS
support would be trivial to add.
Oh, damn. I take that back. We're almost out of flag space in the on
disk inode - these two flags would use the last 2 flag bits so this
may require an on disk inode format change in XFS. This will be
a little more complex than I first thought, but not impossible
as we already support two on-disk inode format versions.
> Since ext4 is in early development now, we believe it'd be easier to get
> such code into ext4 than into the main-line VFS. If there's enough
> interested among the kernel maintainers, we'd be happy to move this
> functionality to the VFS and provide f/s hooks for
> secure-deletion/trash-bin.
I'd certainly like to see new functionality like this added at the
VFS rather than in any particular filesystem. Don't know about
anyone else, though....
> I guess, the right thing to do would be to move the common trash-bin
> (tb.c and tb.h) code into the /fs and /include/linux directories.
And call them trashbin.[ch] ;)
> Also, VFS would require just a couple of trivial changes to support
> something like '-o trashbin' mount-time option for all file systems.
> In addition, individual file systems may support per-file attributes for
> this (e.g., ext2/3/4).
Sounds like a good idea to me.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-06 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-04 18:33 [RFC][PATCH] Secure Deletion and Trash-Bin Support for Ext4 Nikolai Joukov
2006-12-04 23:50 ` David Chinner
2006-12-05 16:41 ` Nikolai Joukov
2006-12-06 9:11 ` David Chinner [this message]
2006-12-06 22:16 ` Nathan Scott
2006-12-07 0:56 ` Josef Sipek
2006-12-07 1:44 ` David Chinner
2006-12-07 2:35 ` Josef Sipek
2006-12-07 2:49 ` David Chinner
2006-12-07 3:14 ` Nicholas Miell
2006-12-07 5:35 ` Josef Sipek
2006-12-07 5:45 ` Nathan Scott
2006-12-09 1:44 ` Nikolai Joukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061206091100.GA33919298@melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=kolya@cs.sunysb.edu \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).