From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Add a norecovery option to ext3/4?
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 05:31:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070409033134.GB13980@implementation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4619B202.3050601@redhat.com>
Eric Sandeen, le Sun 08 Apr 2007 22:24:50 -0500, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Distribution installers usually try to probe OSes for building a suited
> >grub menu. Unfortunately, mounting an ext3 partition, even in read-only
> >mode, does perform some operations on the filesystem (log recovery).
> >This is not a good idea since it may silently garbage data.
>
> Can you elaborate? Under what circumstances is log replay going to harm
> data? Do you mean that the installer mounts partitions, looking for
> what OS is installed? How is that harmful?
>
> Ohhh... this is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=417407
> isn't it?
Yes.
> Hm, so the root cause there seems that the installer found 2 legs of a
> mirror and mounted them independently, recovering them independently...
> But why did that cause problems?
Because that thrashed his data (or at least it didn't help to keep data
safe).
> Other options you may have in the installer, though, is to check for
> md superblocks before mounting bare partitions, or maybe use the
> BLKROSET ioctl to set the block device to read-only prior to mount,
> for added insurance...
That's one the things proposed in the bugreport yes.
Samuel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-09 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-09 0:05 Add a norecovery option to ext3/4? Samuel Thibault
2007-04-09 3:24 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-04-09 3:31 ` Samuel Thibault [this message]
2007-04-09 3:42 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-04-09 14:00 ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-09 4:29 ` Brad Campbell
2007-04-09 10:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-04-09 13:42 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-04-09 16:37 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-11 20:06 ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-09 15:43 ` Phillip Susi
2007-04-09 16:20 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-04-09 17:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-04-10 7:22 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-10 11:27 ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-10 12:08 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-10 16:44 ` Matt Mackall
2007-04-10 18:54 ` Phillip Susi
2007-04-10 19:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-04-10 22:04 ` Phillip Susi
2007-04-11 20:09 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-12 13:54 ` Benny Amorsen
2007-04-15 18:49 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070409033134.GB13980@implementation \
--to=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).