linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, Kalpak Shah <kalpak@clusterfs.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:44:32 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070704164432.GN6578@schatzie.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <468B3FDA.7060809@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Jul 04, 2007  12:06 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Mingming Cao wrote:
> >On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 15:58 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> >>On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
> >>>+
> >>>+#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode)		 \
> >>>+do {								 \
> >>>+	(inode)->xtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime);	    
> >>>\
> >>>+	if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, EXT4_I(inode), xtime ## _extra))  
> >>>\
> >>>+		ext4_decode_extra_time(&(inode)->xtime,			    
> >>>\
> >>>+				       raw_inode->xtime ## _extra);	    
> >>>\
> >>>+} while (0)
> >>>+
> >>>+#define EXT4_EINODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, einode, raw_inode)		 \
> >>>+do {								 \
> >>>+	if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, einode, xtime))		    
> >>>\
> >>>+		(einode)->xtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime);   
> >>>\
> >>>+	if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, einode, xtime ## _extra))	    
> >>>\
> >>>+		ext4_decode_extra_time(&(einode)->xtime,		    
> >>>\
> >>>+				       raw_inode->xtime ## _extra);	    
> >>>\
> >>>+} while (0)
> >>>+
> >>This nanosecond patch seems to be missing the fix below which is 
> >>required for http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5079
> >>
> >>If the timestamp is set to before epoch i.e. a negative timestamp then 
> >>the file may have its date set into the future on 64-bit systems. So 
> >>when the timestamp is read it must be cast as signed.
> >
> >Missed this one.
> >Thanks. Will update ext4 patch queue tonight with this fix.
> 
> IIRC in the conference call it was decided to not to apply this patch. 
> Andreas may be able to update better.

I wasn't on the most recent concall, and I've forgotten the details of
any discussion on a previous concall.

Care really needs to be taken here that negative timestamps are handled
properly.  We can take the sign bit from the inode i_*time, but then we
need to change the load/save of the extra time to use a shift of 31
instead of 32.  If we overflow the epoch we have to ensure that the high
bits of the seconds is handled correctly.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-07-04 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-01  7:36 [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp Mingming Cao
2007-07-03  6:37 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-07-03 10:28 ` Kalpak Shah
2007-07-04  3:32   ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-04  6:36     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-07-04  7:24       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-07-04 16:44       ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2007-07-03 10:41 ` Kalpak Shah
2007-07-10 23:30 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-11  2:00   ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-11 11:14     ` Andreas Dilger
2007-07-11 11:28   ` Andreas Dilger
2007-07-12 12:58   ` Kalpak Shah
2007-07-13  4:29     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-07-13  7:05       ` Kalpak Shah
2007-07-13 21:46         ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-17  0:49   ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-17  9:59     ` Kalpak Shah
2007-07-17 19:08       ` Mingming Cao
2007-07-17 20:44         ` ext4 patch queue updated Mingming Cao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070704164432.GN6578@schatzie.adilger.int \
    --to=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kalpak@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).