linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jose R. Santos" <jrs@us.ibm.com>
To: "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Initial results of FLEX_BG feature.
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:23:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070710112307.34c2ba5c@rx8> (raw)

Hi folks,

I've started playing with the FLEX_BG feature (for now packing of
block group metadata closer together) and started doing some
preliminary benchmarking to see if the feature is worth pursuing.
I chose an FFSB profile that does single threaded small creates and
writes and then does an fsync.  This is something I ran for a customer
a while ago in which ext3 performed poorly.

Here are some of the results (in transactions/sec@%CPU util) on a single
143GB@10K rpm disk.

ext4				1680.54@2.9%
ext4(flex_bg)			2105.56@3.7% 20% improvement
ext4(data=writeback)		1374.50@2.0% <- hum...
ext4(flex_bg data=writeback)	2323.12@3.7% 28% over best ext4
ext3				1025.84@1.7%
ext3(data=writeback)		1136.85@1.7%
ext2				1152.59@0.9%
xfs				1968.84@1.9%
jfs				1424.05@1.2%

The results are from packing the metadata of 64 block groups closer
together at fsck time.  Still need to clean up the e2fsprog patches,
but I hope to submit them to the list later this week for others to
try.  It seems like fsck doesn't quite like the new location of the
metadata and I'm not sure how big of an effort it will be to fix it.  I
mentioned this since one of the assumptions of implementing FLEX_BG was
the reduce time in fsck and it could be a while before I'm able to test
this.

-JRS

             reply	other threads:[~2007-07-10 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-10 16:23 Jose R. Santos [this message]
2007-07-11  4:12 ` Initial results of FLEX_BG feature Andreas Dilger
2007-07-11  5:30   ` Jose R. Santos
2007-07-11  5:39     ` Eric Sandeen
2007-07-11 12:41     ` Andreas Dilger
2007-07-11 22:09     ` Theodore Tso
2007-07-11 22:14     ` Theodore Tso
2007-07-12 15:02       ` Jose R. Santos
2007-07-12 15:09       ` Jose R. Santos
2007-07-16  6:34         ` Andreas Dilger
2007-07-16 12:27           ` Jose R. Santos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070710112307.34c2ba5c@rx8 \
    --to=jrs@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).