From: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, tytso@mit.edu,
cmm@us.ibm.com, suparna@in.ibm.com, adilger@clusterfs.com,
dgc@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6][TAKE7] fallocate() implementation in i386, x86_64 and powerpc
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:48:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070713141858.GB27291@amitarora.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070713132118.GA23256@infradead.org>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 06:17:55PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> > /*
> > + * sys_fallocate - preallocate blocks or free preallocated blocks
> > + * @fd: the file descriptor
> > + * @mode: mode specifies the behavior of allocation.
> > + * @offset: The offset within file, from where allocation is being
> > + * requested. It should not have a negative value.
> > + * @len: The amount of space in bytes to be allocated, from the offset.
> > + * This can not be zero or a negative value.
>
> kerneldoc comments are for in-kernel APIs which syscalls aren't. I'd say
> just temove this comment, the manpage is a much better documentation anyway.
Ok. I will remove this entire comment.
> > + * <TBD> Generic fallocate to be added for file systems that do not
> > + * support fallocate.
>
> Please remove the comment, adding a generic fallback in kernelspace is a
> very dumb idea as we already discussed long time ago.
>
> > --- linux-2.6.22.orig/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ linux-2.6.22/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -266,6 +266,21 @@ extern int dir_notify_enable;
> > #define SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE 2
> > #define SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WAIT_AFTER 4
> >
> > +/*
> > + * sys_fallocate modes
> > + * Currently sys_fallocate supports two modes:
> > + * FALLOC_ALLOCATE : This is the preallocate mode, using which an application
> > + * may request reservation of space for a particular file.
> > + * The file size will be changed if the allocation is
> > + * beyond EOF.
> > + * FALLOC_RESV_SPACE : This is same as the above mode, with only one difference
> > + * that the file size will not be modified.
> > + */
> > +#define FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE 0x01 /* default is extend/shrink size */
> > +
> > +#define FALLOC_ALLOCATE 0
> > +#define FALLOC_RESV_SPACE FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE
>
> Just remove FALLOC_ALLOCATE, 0 flags should be the default. I'm also
> not sure there is any point in having two namespace now that we have a flags-
> based ABI.
Ok. Since we have only one flag (FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) and we do not want
to declare the default mode (FALLOC_ALLOCATE), we can _just_ have this
flag and remove the other mode too (FALLOC_RESV_SPACE).
Is this what you are suggesting ?
> Also please don't add this to fs.h. fs.h is a complete mess and the
> falloc flags are a new user ABI. Add a linux/falloc.h instead which can
> be added to headers-y so the ABI constant can be exported to userspace.
Should we need a header file just to declare one flag - i.e.
FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE (since now there is no point of declaring the two
modes) ? If "linux/fs.h" is not a good place, will "asm-generic/fcntl.h"
be a sane place for this flag ?
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Amit Arora
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-13 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-13 12:38 [PATCH 0/6][TAKE7] fallocate system call Amit K. Arora
2007-07-13 12:46 ` [PATCH 1/6][TAKE7] manpage for fallocate Amit K. Arora
2007-07-13 14:06 ` David Chinner
2007-07-13 14:27 ` Amit K. Arora
2007-07-14 8:23 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-07-16 5:32 ` Amit K. Arora
2007-07-13 12:47 ` [PATCH 2/6][TAKE7] fallocate() implementation in i386, x86_64 and powerpc Amit K. Arora
2007-07-13 13:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-13 14:18 ` Amit K. Arora [this message]
2007-07-13 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-13 12:48 ` [PATCH 3/6][TAKE7] revalidate write permissions for fallocate Amit K. Arora
2007-07-13 13:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-13 14:28 ` Amit K. Arora
2007-07-13 12:50 ` [PATCH 4/6][TAKE7] ext4: fallocate support in ext4 Amit K. Arora
2007-07-13 12:52 ` [PATCH 5/6][TAKE7] ext4: write support for preallocated blocks Amit K. Arora
2007-07-13 12:52 ` [PATCH 6/6][TAKE7] ext4: change for better extent-to-group alignment Amit K. Arora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070713141858.GB27291@amitarora.in.ibm.com \
--to=aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox