From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2 statfs improvement for block and inode free count
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:00:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071016150033.677efd09.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1184377014.15968.14.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:36:54 -0700
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> More statfs() improvements for ext2. ext2 already maintains
> percpu counters for free blocks and inodes. Derive free
> block count and inode count by summing up percpu counters,
> instead of counting up all the groups in the filesystem
> each time.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
>
> fs/ext2/super.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.22/fs/ext2/super.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.22.orig/fs/ext2/super.c 2007-07-13 20:06:38.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.22/fs/ext2/super.c 2007-07-13 20:06:51.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1136,12 +1136,12 @@ static int ext2_statfs (struct dentry *
> buf->f_type = EXT2_SUPER_MAGIC;
> buf->f_bsize = sb->s_blocksize;
> buf->f_blocks = le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count) - overhead;
> - buf->f_bfree = ext2_count_free_blocks(sb);
> + buf->f_bfree = percpu_counter_sum(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
> buf->f_bavail = buf->f_bfree - le32_to_cpu(es->s_r_blocks_count);
> if (buf->f_bfree < le32_to_cpu(es->s_r_blocks_count))
> buf->f_bavail = 0;
> buf->f_files = le32_to_cpu(es->s_inodes_count);
> - buf->f_ffree = ext2_count_free_inodes(sb);
> + buf->f_ffree = percpu_counter_sum(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter);
> buf->f_namelen = EXT2_NAME_LEN;
> fsid = le64_to_cpup((void *)es->s_uuid) ^
> le64_to_cpup((void *)es->s_uuid + sizeof(u64));
>
Guys, I have this patch in a stalled state pending some convincing
demonstration/argument that it's actually a worthwhile change.
How much hurt will it cause on large-numa, and how much benefit do we get
for that hurt?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-16 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-14 1:36 [PATCH] ext2 statfs improvement for block and inode free count Badari Pulavarty
2007-07-19 3:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-19 15:18 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-07-20 9:01 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-10-16 22:00 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-10-16 22:18 ` Badari
2007-10-17 23:15 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071016150033.677efd09.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).