From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@gmail.com>
Cc: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
Girish Shilamkar <girish@clusterfs.com>,
Avantika Mathur <mathur@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]JBD2: Fix journal checksum kernel oops on NUMA
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 00:15:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071105161529.GC2892@webber.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1194278695.17333.3.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Nov 05, 2007 08:04 -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 09:36 +0800, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > But... this implies that every user of bh->b_data needs to kmap, and I
> > don't see that in the code anywhere else. That makes me think something
> > else is going wrong here.
>
> Most cases, this is handled in ll_rw_block() code - when we submit the
> buffer head for IO. If the page is in highmem, we will end up creating
> a bounce bufer for it.
>
> In our case, JBD code is trying to look at the data to do checksum
> on it. Thats why we have to kmap() the page before looking.
My point is that there is a LOT of code in ext[234] that dereferences
bh->b_data without kmap() (e.g. group descriptors, bitmaps, superblock,
inode tables, etc). Does that imply that something is forcing those
bh pages into lowmem, or is the journal bh page in question being
allocated in some different way that allows it to be in highmem?
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Software Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-05 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-30 18:16 jbd2_journal_commit_transaction oops Avantika Mathur
2007-08-31 9:21 ` Girish Shilamkar
2007-08-31 21:32 ` Avantika Mathur
2007-09-13 9:49 ` Girish Shilamkar
2007-11-02 0:40 ` [PATCH][RFC]JBD2: Fix journal checksum kernel oops on NUMA Mingming Cao
2007-11-02 5:20 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-11-02 16:31 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-11-03 1:36 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-11-05 16:04 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-11-05 16:15 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2007-11-05 18:07 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-11-05 23:21 ` Mingming Cao
2007-11-06 1:33 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071105161529.GC2892@webber.adilger.int \
--to=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=girish@clusterfs.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathur@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbadari@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).