From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: cmm@us.ibm.com, tytso@mit.edu, adilger@sun.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Check for return value from sb_set_blocksize
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 23:51:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080109182115.GB11852@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1199898469-10369-2-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Updated patch. The earlier patch did multiple brelse() during failed
mount case.
ext4: Check for return value from sb_set_blocksize
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
sb_set_blocksize validates whether the specfied block size can be used by
the file system. Make sure we fail mounting the file system if the
blocksize specfied cannot be used.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 15 +++++----------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 10330eb..f9a9ef1 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -1793,7 +1793,6 @@ static int ext4_fill_super (struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
unsigned long def_mount_opts;
struct inode *root;
int blocksize;
- int hblock;
int db_count;
int i;
int needs_recovery;
@@ -1958,20 +1957,16 @@ static int ext4_fill_super (struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
goto failed_mount;
}
- hblock = bdev_hardsect_size(sb->s_bdev);
if (sb->s_blocksize != blocksize) {
- /*
- * Make sure the blocksize for the filesystem is larger
- * than the hardware sectorsize for the machine.
- */
- if (blocksize < hblock) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "EXT4-fs: blocksize %d too small for "
- "device blocksize %d.\n", blocksize, hblock);
+
+ /* Validate the filesystem blocksize */
+ if (!sb_set_blocksize(sb, blocksize)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "EXT4-fs: bad block size %d.\n",
+ blocksize);
goto failed_mount;
}
brelse (bh);
- sb_set_blocksize(sb, blocksize);
logical_sb_block = sb_block * EXT4_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE;
offset = do_div(logical_sb_block, blocksize);
bh = sb_bread(sb, logical_sb_block);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-09 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-09 17:07 [PATCH] ext4: Use superblock s_raid_stripe_width as stripe size during block allocation Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-01-09 17:07 ` [PATCH] ext4: Check for return value from sb_set_blocksize Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-01-09 18:21 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2008-01-09 17:21 ` [PATCH] ext4: Use superblock s_raid_stripe_width as stripe size during block allocation Eric Sandeen
2008-01-09 22:02 ` Mingming Cao
2008-01-09 23:36 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-01-10 4:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-01-10 8:22 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080109182115.GB11852@skywalker \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox