From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
sct@redhat.com, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
eparis@redhat.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm1 - BUG in fs/jbd/transaction.c
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:27:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080402192715.GA32454@unused.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6495.1207163569@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:12:49PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:32:14 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc8/2.6.25-rc8-mm1/
>
> (Yes, I know the kernel is tainted. Hopefully the traceback will make
> enough sense that it won't matter. I think I cc'd most everybody who is
> listed in MAINTAINERS or had a non-trivial jbd, quota, or ext3 patch in the broken-out/)
>
> So I was running a 'yum update' on my laptop, walked away to ask a cow-orker
> a question, and came back to find it had BUG'ed twice... Amazingly
> enough, although it died in ext3 code, it apparently only nuked whatever
> filesystem it was handling, as syslog was still able to log the gory details
> into a file in /var. Given that a kernel rpm was the one it failed on, the
> I/O was almost certainly on either / or /boot - both ext3. / is mounted
> with quotas, /boot isn't, so I'm betting on /
>
> Apr 2 13:48:07 turing-police yum: Updated: texlive-texmf-latex-2007-18.fc9.noarch
> Apr 2 13:48:08 turing-police yum: Updated: 1:openoffice.org-xsltfilter-2.4.0-12.4.fc9.x86_64
> Apr 2 13:48:09 turing-police yum: Updated: 1:openoffice.org-javafilter-2.4.0-12.4.fc9.x86_64
> Apr 2 13:48:12 turing-police yum: Updated: kernel-headers-2.6.25-0.185.rc7.git6.fc9.x86_64
>
> (here, it started updating kernel-2.6.25-0.185.rc7.git6 and died while I wasn't looking)
<snip>
Try this patch, it will keep us from re-entering the fs when we aren't supposed
to. cc'ing Eric Paris since he's the only selinux guy I know :). I don't think
any of the other allocations in here need to be fixed, but I didn't look too
carefully.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index c2fef7b..820d07a 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int inode_alloc_security(struct inode *inode)
struct task_security_struct *tsec = current->security;
struct inode_security_struct *isec;
- isec = kmem_cache_zalloc(sel_inode_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+ isec = kmem_cache_zalloc(sel_inode_cache, GFP_NOFS);
if (!isec)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -2429,7 +2429,7 @@ static int selinux_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (name) {
- namep = kstrdup(XATTR_SELINUX_SUFFIX, GFP_KERNEL);
+ namep = kstrdup(XATTR_SELINUX_SUFFIX, GFP_NOFS);
if (!namep)
return -ENOMEM;
*name = namep;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-02 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080401213214.8fbb6d6b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2008-04-02 19:12 ` 2.6.25-rc8-mm1 - BUG in fs/jbd/transaction.c Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-04-02 19:27 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2008-04-02 19:39 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-02 19:41 ` Josef Bacik
2008-04-03 18:18 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-04-03 23:02 ` James Morris
2008-04-04 12:46 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-04-06 23:54 ` James Morris
2008-04-04 10:15 ` Jan Kara
2008-04-04 12:53 ` 2.6.25-rc8-mm1 - BUG in fs/jbd/transaction.c' Josef Bacik
2008-04-03 18:25 ` 2.6.25-rc8-mm1 - BUG in fs/jbd/transaction.c Stephen Smalley
2008-04-02 19:30 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-03 8:57 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080402192715.GA32454@unused.rdu.redhat.com \
--to=jbacik@redhat.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox