Re: ［PATCH] ext4: fix error ext number comments

Re: ［PATCH] ext4: fix error ext number comments

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 15 May 2008 10:21:27 +0800
Shen Feng <shen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Subject: ［PATCH] ext4: fix error ext number comments

Oh dear.  When my eail client (sylpheed) saves this email to a file I get

Subject: =?GB2312?B?o9tQQVRDSF0gZXh0NDogZml4IGVycm9yIGV4dCBudW1iZXIgY29tbQ==?=
 =?GB2312?B?ZW50cw==?=


This can only increase.  Sigh, life used to be simple.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: ［PATCH] ext4: fix error ext number comments

[Theodore Tso]

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 04:38:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 10:21:27 +0800
> Shen Feng <shen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > Subject: ［PATCH] ext4: fix error ext number comments
> 
> Oh dear.  When my eail client (sylpheed) saves this email to a file I get
> 
> Subject: =?GB2312?B?o9tQQVRDSF0gZXh0NDogZml4IGVycm9yIGV4dCBudW1iZXIgY29tbQ==?=
>  =?GB2312?B?ZW50cw==?=
> 
> 
> This can only increase.  Sigh, life used to be simple.

This message aparently never made it to the linux-ext4 mailing list.
It's not in my inbox or in my linux-ext4 archive (although your reply
has made it there).  I wonder if the vger dropped it as "chinese
spam".  :-)

Could you forward it, please?

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix error ext number comments

[Shen Feng]

Andrew Morton Wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 10:21:27 +0800
> Shen Feng <shen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
>> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix error ext number comments
> 
> Oh dear.  When my eail client (sylpheed) saves this email to a file I get
> 
> Subject: =?GB2312?B?o9tQQVRDSF0gZXh0NDogZml4IGVycm9yIGV4dCBudW1iZXIgY29tbQ==?=
>  =?GB2312?B?ZW50cw==?=
> 
> 
> This can only increase.  Sigh, life used to be simple.
> 
> 

It seems that there is a coding problem.
Sorry for that.  And the fix is not complete and here is the new one.

ext4: fix error ext number comments

Change second/third to fourth.

Signed-off-by: Shen Feng <shen@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/ext4/ext4.h    |    2 +-
 fs/ext4/ext4_i.h  |    2 +-
 fs/ext4/ext4_sb.h |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 8158083..f8e22e4 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 #include "ext4_i.h"

 /*
- * The second extended filesystem constants/structures
+ * The fourth extended filesystem constants/structures
  */

 /*
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_i.h b/fs/ext4/ext4_i.h
index 26a4ae2..abf2744 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4_i.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_i.h
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct ext4_ext_cache {
 };

 /*
- * third extended file system inode data in memory
+ * fourth extended file system inode data in memory
  */
 struct ext4_inode_info {
 	__le32	i_data[15];	/* unconverted */
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_sb.h b/fs/ext4/ext4_sb.h
index 5802e69..4de9a75 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4_sb.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_sb.h
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 #include <linux/rbtree.h>

 /*
- * third extended-fs super-block data in memory
+ * fourth extended-fs super-block data in memory
  */
 struct ext4_sb_info {
 	unsigned long s_desc_size;	/* Size of a group descriptor in bytes */
-- 1.5.4.1