From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
cmm@us.ibm.com, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] ext4: Use inode preallocation with -o noextents
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:42:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080605191251.GC4723@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080605182830.GW2961@webber.adilger.int>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 12:28:30PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jun 05, 2008 11:37 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > This is better, but it still means that we are exporting a large
> > number of functions to the callers. It's not clear to me we need so
> > many different variants of ext4_new_blocks_* --- what is their
> > justification to exist?
> >
> > For example, why not just have:
> >
> > static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_new_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> > ext4_lblk_t iblock, ext4_fsblk_t goal,
> > unsigned long *count, int *errp, int meta)
> >
> > where if inode is NULL, then you're allocating a metadata block, and
> > if count is NULL, then you only want one block. Of course, this needs
> > to be carefully documented at the function.
>
> I don't necessarily agree that meta should be implied by inode != NULL.
> We do want to cluster metadata allocations for a single inode if possible,
> so keeping the inode information is useful. We may want to keep a separate
> "metadata goal block" from the "data goal block" in the inode...
>
> That said, it seems you still have a "meta" parameter here? I always hate
> having an int for a boolean, and we may as well make this a "flags" so
> that when we want to improve it later we don't need to rename it and change
> all of the "1" parameters to "EXT4_META_BLOCK". Do it right the first time.
>
how about ?
diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
index c6e6a6f..014e5b5 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -1928,9 +1928,11 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_orlov_new_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
return 0;
}
+#defin EXT4_META_BLOCK 0x1
+
static ext4_fsblk_t do_blk_alloc(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
ext4_lblk_t iblock, ext4_fsblk_t goal,
- unsigned long *count, int *errp, int meta)
+ unsigned long *count, int *errp, int flags)
{
struct ext4_allocation_request ar;
ext4_fsblk_t ret;
@@ -1950,7 +1952,7 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t do_blk_alloc(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
ar.goal = goal;
ar.len = *count;
ar.logical = iblock;
- if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !meta)
+ if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !(flags & EXT4_META_BLOCK))
ar.flags = EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA;
else
/* disable in-core preallocation for non-regular files */
@@ -1965,13 +1967,15 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_new_meta_block(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
ext4_fsblk_t goal, int *errp)
{
unsigned long count = 1;
- return do_blk_alloc(handle, inode, 0, goal, &count, errp, 1);
+ return do_blk_alloc(handle, inode, 0, goal, &count,
+ errp, EXT4_META_BLOCK);
}
ext4_fsblk_t ext4_new_meta_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
ext4_fsblk_t goal, unsigned long *count, int *errp)
{
- return do_blk_alloc(handle, inode, 0, goal, count, errp, 1);
+ return do_blk_alloc(handle, inode, 0, goal, count,
+ errp, EXT4_META_BLOCK);
}
ext4_fsblk_t ext4_new_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-05 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-19 20:34 [PATCH -v2] ext4: Use inode preallocation with -o noextents Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-04 2:23 ` Theodore Tso
2008-06-04 4:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-05 3:22 ` Theodore Tso
2008-06-05 8:43 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-05 14:55 ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-05 18:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-05 18:46 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-06 21:33 ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-11 3:26 ` Shen Feng
2008-06-12 9:34 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-12 13:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-11 3:44 ` Shen Feng
2008-06-16 3:41 ` Shen Feng
2008-06-17 9:42 ` Shen Feng
2008-06-17 10:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-18 1:43 ` Shen Feng
2008-06-05 15:37 ` Theodore Tso
2008-06-05 18:28 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-05 19:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2008-06-05 20:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-06 16:26 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080605191251.GC4723@skywalker \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).