From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Gary Hawco <ghawco@cox.net>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Segmentation Faults with both 062608 snapshots
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:32:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080701023252.GA28143@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20080626221227.0242af78@pop.west.cox.net>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:12:27PM +0000, Gary Hawco wrote:
> More on my segmentation problems. Just looking at the end of each kernel
> message, they always end with:
> EIP [XXXXX] jbd2_journal_data_metadata-XXX
Hmm... any chance you can take a picture of the crash message with a
digital camera and post the jpg? (I'm assuming you haven't been able
to capture the OOPS stack trace in /var/log/kern.log or
/var/log/messages or some such.)
> This occurs when I try to copy data from my main partition to a backup
> partition or make a tarball.
I am currently using the ext4 patch queue comit id #555132eb from
2008-06-30 13:04:35 -0400, and I can't reproduce it. I just tried
backing up by isync mail directory to a tar.gz file and then restored
it, with no problems. Both the source and backup partition are ext4
filesystems with flex_bg, meta_bg, and uninit_bg, located on separate
LVM logical volumes on my laptop.[1]
[1] http://thunk.org/tytso/blog/2008/06/30/ext4-is-now-the-primary-filesystem-on-my-laptop/
The partition is mounted using mount options:
noatime,errors=remount-ro,barrier=1,data=ordered
according to /proc/mounts.
The big difference between your mount options and mine is that I dont
have journal_async_commit as a mount option. Which would be largely
moot for me since LVM doesn't support barrier operations. :-( :-( :-(
You seem to be able to reproduce the problem at will. Could you try
removing te journal_sync_commit option and see if it makes the problem
go away? That would be very interesting if it were the case...
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-01 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-25 13:53 Segmentation Faults with 062508 ext4-patch-queue snapshot Gary Hawco
2008-06-26 4:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-26 22:12 ` Segmentation Faults with both 062608 snapshots Gary Hawco
2008-07-01 2:32 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-07-01 0:00 ` More ext4dev snapshot weirdness Gary Hawco
2008-07-01 16:02 ` Theodore Tso
2008-07-01 10:54 ` delalloc filesystem corruption Gary Hawco
2008-07-01 23:00 ` Mingming Cao
2008-07-01 17:50 ` Gentoo with ext4-patch-queue snapshots Gary Hawco
2008-07-02 17:19 ` Mingming Cao
2008-07-02 20:33 ` Mingming Cao
2008-07-03 14:07 ` Aneesh Kumar
2008-07-03 17:38 ` Mingming Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080701023252.GA28143@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=ghawco@cox.net \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).