From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: Gary Hawco <ghawco@cox.net>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Add ext4__allow_read-only_mounts_with_corrupted_block_group_checksums patch
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:34:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080716133407.GT8185@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080716092914.GR6239@webber.adilger.int>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:29:14AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > Rebooted and e2fsck saw errors and did a forced fsck without having to
> > reboot. All is well thus far.
>
> You shouldn't really have rebooted at that point, just run e2fsck on
> the filesystem to clear the checksums.
This was the root filesystem so he couldn't have run e2fsck on the
mounted filesystem.
> > Then I did the reverse: tune2fs -O uninit_bg /dev/sda6 to renable uninit_bg
> > feature. Again, I was prompted to run e2fsck on system.
>
> Again, you should have just run e2fsck on the filesystem without rebooting,
> in order to update the checksums.
Ditto.
> > I was under the impression that the newest patch would handle this or am I
> > mistaken?
>
> We probably need to allow the kernel to mount the filesystem read-only in
> this case in order to run e2fsck.
That's what the patch I added in the latest snapshot was supposed to
do. I admit I haven't had a chance to test it yet, but the code looks
like it should do the right thing. You are sure that you are mounting
the root filesystem read/only (there is "ro" on the boot command line)
and this is the kernel with this patch applied, right?
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-16 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-15 19:31 Add ext4__allow_read-only_mounts_with_corrupted_block_group_checksums patch Gary Hawco
2008-07-16 9:29 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-16 13:34 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-07-18 12:59 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080716133407.GT8185@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=ghawco@cox.net \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox