public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: Gary Hawco <ghawco@cox.net>,
	"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Add ext4__allow_read-only_mounts_with_corrupted_block_group_checksums patch
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:34:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080716133407.GT8185@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080716092914.GR6239@webber.adilger.int>

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:29:14AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > Rebooted and e2fsck saw errors and did a forced fsck without having to
> > reboot. All is well thus far.
> 
> You shouldn't really have rebooted at that point, just run e2fsck on
> the filesystem to clear the checksums.

This was the root filesystem so he couldn't have run e2fsck on the
mounted filesystem.

> > Then I did the reverse: tune2fs -O uninit_bg /dev/sda6 to renable uninit_bg
> > feature.  Again, I was prompted to run e2fsck on system.
> 
> Again, you should have just run e2fsck on the filesystem without rebooting,
> in order to update the checksums.

Ditto.

> > I was under the impression that the newest patch would handle this or am I
> > mistaken?
> 
> We probably need to allow the kernel to mount the filesystem read-only in
> this case in order to run e2fsck.

That's what the patch I added in the latest snapshot was supposed to
do.  I admit I haven't had a chance to test it yet, but the code looks
like it should do the right thing.  You are sure that you are mounting
the root filesystem read/only (there is "ro" on the boot command line)
and this is the kernel with this patch applied, right?

							- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-16 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-15 19:31 Add ext4__allow_read-only_mounts_with_corrupted_block_group_checksums patch Gary Hawco
2008-07-16  9:29 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-16 13:34   ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-07-18 12:59 ` Theodore Tso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080716133407.GT8185@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=ghawco@cox.net \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox