From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with delayed allocation
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 21:03:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080804153331.GD9397@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080804152730.GC9397@skywalker>
Hi Ted,
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:57:30PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:22:49PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 04:07:19PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > >
> > > Apparently __fsync_super(), which is called right before remounting a
> > > filesystem read-only, isn't working correctly. To reproduce, create a
> > > script which does this:
> > >
> > > #!/bin/sh
> > > DEVICE=/dev/closure/test
> > > mke2fs -t ext4dev /dev/closure/test
> > > mount $DEVICE /mnt
> > > cd /mnt
> > > tar xfj /var/tmp/linux-2.6.26.tar.gz <----- or some really big file
> > > du -s
> > > cd ..
> > > mount -o remount,ro /mnt
> > > sync
> > > dmesg > /tmp/dmesg.out <----- note all of the ext4_da_writepages error messages
> > > umount /mnt
> > > du -s /mnt
> > > sync
> > > mount $DEVICE /mnt
> > > du -s /mnt <--- note that size of the unpacked hierarcy is much smaller
> > >
> > > This doesn't happen if the ext4 filesystem is mounted with nodelalloc,
> > > so I assume the problem is in ext4_da_writepages().
> > >
> >
> > Can you try this patch and see if it makes any difference ?
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > index 25adfc3..5a8a2d3 100644
> > --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > @@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ void generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
> > spin_lock(&inode_lock);
> > if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
> > wbc->more_io = 1;
> > + printk(KERN_CRIT "Breaking from the %s loop\n", __func__);
> > break;
> > }
> > if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io))
> > @@ -611,6 +612,8 @@ void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
> > (inodes_stat.nr_inodes - inodes_stat.nr_unused) +
> > nr_dirty + nr_unstable;
> > wbc.nr_to_write += wbc.nr_to_write / 2; /* Bit more for luck */
> > + wbc.nr_to_write = LONG_MAX;
> > +
> > sync_sb_inodes(sb, &wbc);
> > }
> >
>
>
> I guess this could be the reason. I am not hitting the error during
> remount, ro with this change. But I have other changes also accumulated
> as a part of rewrite.
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 4a50445..ecabe77 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -2225,8 +2288,10 @@ static int ext4_da_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
> if (!mapping->nrpages || !mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY))
> return 0;
>
> +#if 0
> if (wbc->nr_to_write > mapping->nrpages)
> wbc->nr_to_write = mapping->nrpages;
> +#endif
>
>
> if (!wbc->range_cyclic) {
The reason why you are able to reproduce it with the linus tree is
because of
/*
* set the max dirty pages could be write at a time
* to fit into the reserved transaction credits
*/
if (wbc->nr_to_write > EXT4_MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES)
wbc->nr_to_write = EXT4_MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES;
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-04 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-02 20:07 Problem with delayed allocation Theodore Ts'o
2008-08-02 22:40 ` Theodore Tso
2008-08-04 3:16 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-04 14:08 ` Theodore Tso
2008-08-04 14:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-04 15:27 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-04 15:33 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2008-08-04 16:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-05 6:44 ` Theodore Tso
2008-08-05 6:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-05 13:21 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-05 13:47 ` Theodore Tso
2008-08-05 14:24 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-05 15:16 ` Theodore Tso
2008-08-06 10:05 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-06 10:11 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-08-07 0:49 ` Mingming Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080804153331.GD9397@skywalker \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox