public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: Abhijit Paithankar <apaithan@akamai.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Filesystem Journal Notifications
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:51:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080920155142.GC6061@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080919203402.GI10950@webber.adilger.int>

Andreas Dilger wrote:
> That assumes agreement between the applications that are using this
> interface.  It isn't at all desirable that applications have to know
> the "mountpoint" of the filesystem in order to use inotify, and in
> some cases (e.g. bind mount in a new namespace) there isn't even access
> to the root inode.

A filesystem's root inode needn't be mounted at all.

You don't need a new namespace - bind mount is enough by itself.

It has me wondering - how can an application even tell when it has the
root inode of a filesystem?  You can't tell from /etc/mtab or
/proc/mounts, nor from traversing the filesystem itself - except for
filesystems where you know the expected inode number of the root inode.

-- Jamie

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-20 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20080912220649.GB26999@apaithan-desktop.sanmateo.corp.akamai.com>
     [not found] ` <20080915023126.GF4090@webber.adilger.int>
2008-09-15  5:39   ` [RFC PATCH] Filesystem Journal Notifications Andreas Dilger
2008-09-15 19:36     ` Abhijit Paithankar
2008-09-15 23:37       ` Andreas Dilger
2008-09-16 23:05         ` Abhijit Paithankar
2008-09-19 20:34           ` Andreas Dilger
2008-09-20 15:51             ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2008-09-20  5:15       ` Jan Kara
2008-09-23 22:26         ` Andreas Dilger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080920155142.GC6061@shareable.org \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=apaithan@akamai.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox