From: Simon Kirby <sim@netnation.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: EXT3 way too happy with write errors
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:22:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081015002256.GD25662@hostway.ca> (raw)
Hello!
While attempting to track down failed write error at a device layer,
I noticed that EXT3 seems to behave strangely after a single block I/O
failure.
I would expect that upon the first failed request, it would abort the
journal and remount-ro (if errors=remount-ro is specified). Instead, it
seems to happily plonk along until I inject a few more failures (testing
with the fault injection framework), until it eventually fails enough to
abort the journal. However, by then, "fsck" will show corruption --
sometimes severe. If I force only one or two of write failures and
then unmount, I can reproduce consistency corruption that shows up
with "fsck -f" even though the file system is not marked "errors"!
Why is this?
Example:
Oct 9 19:57:31 nas02 kernel: kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
Oct 9 19:57:31 nas02 kernel: EXT3 FS on etherd/e3.0p1, internal journal
Oct 9 19:57:31 nas02 kernel: EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
Oct 9 20:00:18 nas02 kernel: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure
Oct 9 20:00:18 nas02 kernel: Buffer I/O error on device etherd/e3.0p1, logical block 5186046
Oct 9 20:00:18 nas02 kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on etherd/e3.0p1
Oct 9 20:00:37 nas02 kernel: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure
Oct 9 20:00:37 nas02 kernel: Buffer I/O error on device etherd/e3.0p1, logical block 410322
Oct 9 20:00:37 nas02 kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on etherd/e3.0p1
Oct 9 20:00:40 nas02 kernel: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure
Oct 9 20:00:40 nas02 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device etherd/e3.0p1): read_block_bitmap: Cannot read block bitmap - block_group = 18, block_bitmap = 589824
Oct 9 20:00:40 nas02 kernel: Aborting journal on device etherd/e3.0p1.
Oct 9 20:00:40 nas02 kernel: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure
Oct 9 20:00:40 nas02 kernel: Buffer I/O error on device etherd/e3.0p1, logical block 1545
Oct 9 20:00:40 nas02 kernel: lost page write due to I/O error on etherd/e3.0p1
Oct 9 20:00:40 nas02 kernel: Remounting filesystem read-only
[sroot@nas02:/]# fsck -C /mnt/web00
fsck 1.40-WIP (14-Nov-2006)
e2fsck 1.40-WIP (14-Nov-2006)
/dev/etherd/e3.0p1: recovering journal
/dev/etherd/e3.0p1 contains a file system with errors, check forced.
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Inode 49153, i_blocks is 2942528, should be 2942520. Fix<y>?
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
/dev/etherd/e3.0p1: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
/dev/etherd/e3.0p1: 126254/24690688 files (0.1% non-contiguous), 1778971/49359704 blocks
Shouldn't it be the case that the first request failure should
remount-ro? Assuming the fault merely denied a single read or write
request, it should then be possible to reboot or remount,rw after the
fault is fixed and have consistency after just a journal replay...
Cheers,
Simon-
next reply other threads:[~2008-10-15 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-15 0:22 Simon Kirby [this message]
2008-12-18 17:07 ` EXT3 way too happy with write errors Jan Kara
2008-12-18 17:18 ` Simon Kirby
2008-12-18 17:27 ` Jan Kara
2008-12-18 17:49 ` Simon Kirby
2008-12-18 18:29 ` Michael Rubin
2009-01-03 2:15 ` Simon Kirby
2009-01-03 2:45 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081015002256.GD25662@hostway.ca \
--to=sim@netnation.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).