From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: The default assignee for the ext4 component goes nowhere Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:23:00 -0500 Message-ID: <20081103182300.GF29102@mit.edu> References: <20081102134803.28c12d8b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081102230806.GN8134@mit.edu> <20081102193226.df026896.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <8f3aa8d60811022301tc784cc1saea84719aa20d7a4@mail.gmail.com> <490F2DC4.9010909@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Martin Bligh , Andrew Morton , bugme-admin@linux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Sami Liedes , Francois Valenduc To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from www.church-of-our-saviour.org ([69.25.196.31]:49630 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751396AbYKCSXN (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:23:13 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <490F2DC4.9010909@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 10:58:44AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Martin Bligh wrote: > > A (very) few people have requested mailing lists get cc'ed on some > > categories, for which we've set up mailing list users, and had them > > watch the categories too. > > I think this makes sense for ext4 (I think xfs was one of those few; > bugs go to xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com for that category IIRC) so at least > people see them. > > Would anyone on linux-ext4 disagree with setting up the list to watch > the ext3 & ext4 categories? On the theory that it is easier to ask forgiveness than to get permission :-), I've subscribed linux-ext4@vger.ekernel org to the ext2, ext3, and ext4 categories. If this result in too much e-mail, folks can complain and we can cut things back. - Ted