From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -v2 7/9] ext4: don't use the block freed but not yet committed during buddy initialization
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:53:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081105152322.GC6244@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081104171515.GL30291@mit.edu>
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:15:15PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:06:07PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > +static void ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist(struct super_block *sb, void *bitmap,
> > + ext4_group_t group,
> > + struct ext4_free_data *entry)
> > +{
> ...
> > + if (n->rb_left) {
> > + new_entry = rb_entry(n->rb_left, struct ext4_free_data, node);
> > + ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist(sb, bitmap, group, new_entry);
> > + }
> > + if (n->rb_right) {
> > + new_entry = rb_entry(n->rb_right, struct ext4_free_data, node);
> > + ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist(sb, bitmap, group, new_entry);
> > + }
>
> ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist() is recursively calling itself, which
> could easily blow the stack if there are a large number of items on
> the free list (remember, this can include data blocks if
> !ext4_should_writeback_data()).
>
> You should probably use rb_first and rb_next in a loop rather than a
> recursive descent.
Will do this.
>I also remain concerned that
> ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist() is could burn a large amount of CPU
> in some cases, and as I said on the conference call, if there is a way
> to avoid it, that would be a Good Thing.
We need ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist for multiple case
a) While generating the buddy information we need to make sure we don't
use the blocks released but not yet committed to disk. We may force
buddy rebuild because we added a new group via resize. We need to do
a buddy rebuild irrespective of whether we use ext4_mb_free_blocks or
EXT4_MB_GRP_NEED_INIT flag
b) We we release inode preallocation we look at the block bitmap
and mark the blocks found free in the bitmap using mb_free_blocks.
Now if we allocate some blocks and later free some of them we may
have called ext4_mb_free blocks on them which mean we would have
marked the blocks free on bitmap. Now on file close we release
inode pa. We look at the block bitmap and if the block is free
in bitmap we call mb_free_blocks. Also on committing the transaction we
call mb_free_blocks on them. To avoid the above we need to make sure
when we discard_inode_pa we look at a bitmap that have block freed
and not yet committed as used.
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-05 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-03 17:36 [RFC PATCH -v2 1/9] ext4: sparse fixes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-03 17:36 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 2/9] ext4: Add blocks added during resize to bitmap Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-03 17:36 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 3/9] ext4: Use EXT4_GROUP_INFO_NEED_INIT_BIT during resize Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-03 17:36 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 4/9] ext4: cleanup mballoc header files Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-03 17:36 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 5/9] ext4: sparse annotate the group info semaphore Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-03 17:36 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 6/9] ext4: Call journal commit callback without holding j_list_lock Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-03 17:36 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 7/9] ext4: don't use the block freed but not yet committed during buddy initialization Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-03 17:36 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 8/9] ext4: Fix double free of blocks Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-03 17:36 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 9/9] ext4: Fix lockdep recursive locking warning Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-04 18:15 ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-04 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 8/9] ext4: Fix double free of blocks Theodore Tso
2008-11-05 15:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-04 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 7/9] ext4: don't use the block freed but not yet committed during buddy initialization Theodore Tso
2008-11-05 15:23 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2008-11-04 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 6/9] ext4: Call journal commit callback without holding j_list_lock Theodore Tso
2008-11-04 18:13 ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-04 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 5/9] ext4: sparse annotate the group info semaphore Theodore Tso
2008-11-05 14:59 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-04 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 3/9] ext4: Use EXT4_GROUP_INFO_NEED_INIT_BIT during resize Theodore Tso
2008-11-05 14:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-11-04 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH -v2 1/9] ext4: sparse fixes Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081105152322.GC6244@skywalker \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox