From: "Michael B. Trausch" <mike@trausch.us>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "tune2fs -I 256" runtime---can it be interrupted safely?
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:09:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081111110910.4a6f7941@zest> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081107211643.GB3184@webber.adilger.int>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1521 bytes --]
On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:16:43 -0700
Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com> wrote:
> If you have time, after the backup is done could you please re-try the
> "tune2fs -I 256" operation and let it go for a while, then "ltrace -p
> {pid}" on the process from another window to see what it is doing (if
> anything). You may need to have the "e2fsprogs-debuginfo" RPM
> installed to get useful data there.
>
> After grabbing some of the data with ltrace, also run "strace -p
> {pid}" to get disk IO information, and finally "gdb -p {pid}" and
> grab a stack trace with "bt", let it continue for a few seconds with
> "c", and then CTRL-C again and grab another stack trace with "bt".
Ugh, I forgot to do the gdb backtraces. *headdesk* I will do another
run with them later.
I do have an ltrace up and online at:
http://fd0man.theunixplace.com/tune2fs.ltrace.bz2
The bzip2 file is 44 MB, and the uncompressed text is _huge_ (about 3
GB). This is a two hour run of "tune2fs -I 256 /dev/sdb" on an
external 250 GB (235 GiB) drive formatted with the ext3 filesystem.
I aborted the tune2fs run after 2 hours, though I am sure it would have
run for far longer. Hopefully, this will give some insight as to what
the problem might be.
I _was_ hoping that it would make a difference in runtime that the
filesystem was empty (I did this right after "mkfs.ext3 -I
128 /dev/sdb"), but it was still going very slowly...
--- Mike
--
My sigfile ran away and is on hiatus.
http://www.trausch.us/
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-11 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-01 19:10 "tune2fs -I 256" runtime---can it be interrupted safely? Michael B. Trausch
2008-11-01 23:46 ` Michael B. Trausch
2008-11-07 21:16 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-11-11 16:09 ` Michael B. Trausch [this message]
2008-11-14 8:30 ` Andreas Dilger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-14 12:49 Andreas Schultz
2008-11-14 21:06 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-11-15 5:50 ` Theodore Tso
2008-11-16 12:11 ` Andreas Schultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081111110910.4a6f7941@zest \
--to=mike@trausch.us \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox