From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu_counter: Fix __percpu_counter_sum()
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:00:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081208230047.GC2501@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228774836.16244.22.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 11:20:35PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> atomic_t is pretty good on all archs, but you get to keep the cacheline
> ping-pong.
>
Stupid question --- if you're worried about cacheline ping-pongs, why
aren't each cpu's delta counter cacheline aligned? With a 64-byte
cache-line, and a 32-bit counters entry, with less than 16 CPU's we're
going to be getting cache ping-pong effects with percpu_counter's,
right? Or am I missing something?
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-08 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4936D287.6090206@cosmosbay.com>
[not found] ` <4936EB04.8000609@cosmosbay.com>
2008-12-07 4:22 ` [PATCH] percpu_counter: Fix __percpu_counter_sum() Andrew Morton
2008-12-07 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-07 13:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-12-07 17:28 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-07 18:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-12-08 4:52 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-08 22:12 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-08 22:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-08 23:00 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-12-08 23:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-08 23:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-09 8:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-12-09 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-10 5:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-12-10 5:49 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-10 22:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-12-12 8:17 ` Rusty Russell
2008-12-12 8:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-12-12 11:08 ` [PATCH] percpu_counter: use local_t and atomic_long_t if possible Eric Dumazet
2008-12-12 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-23 11:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-25 13:26 ` Rusty Russell
2008-12-15 12:53 ` [PATCH] percpu_counter: Fix __percpu_counter_sum() Rusty Russell
2008-12-16 20:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-10 7:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-08 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-08 23:49 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-08 22:22 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-08 22:44 ` Mingming Cao
2008-12-07 22:24 ` [PATCH] atomic: fix a typo in atomic_long_xchg() Eric Dumazet
2008-12-07 15:28 ` [PATCH] percpu_counter: Fix __percpu_counter_sum() Theodore Tso
2008-12-08 4:42 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-08 17:55 ` Mingming Cao
2008-12-11 16:32 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2008-12-08 17:44 ` Mingming Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081208230047.GC2501@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).