From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: csights@fastmail.fm, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 12224] New: journal activity on inactive partition causes inactive harddrive spinup
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:52:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081215005257.GE13060@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-12224-13602@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
> Activity on one partition (hda1) causes kjournald to also write
> to another partition (sda1). This in turn causes the harddrive
> which contains sda1 to spinup or not spindown. I've activated
> laptop-mode using laptop-mode-tools. hda1 and sda1 are both
> formatted with ext3. On unaffected kernels (e.g. 2.6.27.5) btrace
> produces no output. On affected kernels (e.g. 2.6.27.6, 2.6.27-rc7)
> btrace produces output as below.
I've looked at the changes between 2.6.27.5 and 2.6.27.6, and I don't
see anything that might explain such a regression. Indeed, there's
only one patch between .5 and .6 that even touches ext3, and the patch
seems pretty innocent.
Is /dev/sda1 even mounted? It doesn't included up in your /etc/mtab
listing.
The only thing I can suggest is to try 2.6.27.6 with the only patch
that touches ext3 reverted (i.e., unapply it with patch -R). If the
problem still shows up, I would suggest getting the linux-2.6.27.y
tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.27.y.git
And then doing a git bisection search to try to find the guilty
commit.
Regards,
- Ted
commit a0b8bfb34743b6e6c2bb06ad5a270590d90270f7
Author: Arthur Jones <ajones@riverbed.com>
Date: Fri Nov 7 00:05:17 2008 +0000
ext3: wait on all pending commits in ext3_sync_fs
commit c87591b719737b4e91eb1a9fa8fd55a4ff1886d6 upstream
In ext3_sync_fs, we only wait for a commit to finish if we started it, but
there may be one already in progress which will not be synced.
In the case of a data=ordered umount with pending long symlinks which are
delayed due to a long list of other I/O on the backing block device, this
causes the buffer associated with the long symlinks to not be moved to the
inode dirty list in the second phase of fsync_super. Then, before they
can be dirtied again, kjournald exits, seeing the UMOUNT flag and the
dirty pages are never written to the backing block device, causing long
symlink corruption and exposing new or previously freed block data to
userspace.
This can be reproduced with a script created
by Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>:
#!/bin/bash
umount /mnt/test2
mount /dev/sdb4 /mnt/test2
rm -f /mnt/test2/*
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test2/bigfile bs=1M count=512
touch
/mnt/test2/thisisveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryverylongfilename
ln -s
/mnt/test2/thisisveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryveryverylongfilename
/mnt/test2/link
umount /mnt/test2
mount /dev/sdb4 /mnt/test2
ls /mnt/test2/
umount /mnt/test2
To ensure all commits are synced, we flush all journal commits now when
sync_fs'ing ext3.
Signed-off-by: Arthur Jones <ajones@riverbed.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
diff --git a/fs/ext3/super.c b/fs/ext3/super.c
index f38a5af..810bf7c 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/super.c
@@ -2365,13 +2365,12 @@ static void ext3_write_super (struct super_block * sb)
static int ext3_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
{
- tid_t target;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-15 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-14 19:39 [Bug 12224] New: journal activity on inactive partition causes inactive harddrive spinup bugme-daemon
2008-12-14 22:29 ` [Bug 12224] " bugme-daemon
2008-12-14 22:30 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-14 23:10 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-12-15 1:22 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2008-12-14 23:10 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-15 0:52 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-12-15 1:22 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-15 1:25 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-15 2:47 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-15 5:07 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-15 21:49 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-16 20:35 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-16 22:01 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-17 2:30 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-18 19:56 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-18 20:41 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-18 23:02 ` bugme-daemon
2009-01-13 22:17 ` bugme-daemon
2009-01-14 20:35 ` bugme-daemon
2009-01-14 20:44 ` bugme-daemon
2009-01-14 22:37 ` bugme-daemon
2009-01-14 22:58 ` bugme-daemon
2009-01-15 1:09 ` bugme-daemon
2009-01-15 15:48 ` bugme-daemon
2009-01-15 16:12 ` bugme-daemon
2009-01-15 21:03 ` bugme-daemon
2009-02-23 12:22 ` bugme-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081215005257.GE13060@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=csights@fastmail.fm \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).