From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000 [ext4_new_meta_blocks+0x7c/0xb7]
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:26:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081217075635.GA7685@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081212145609.GA26085@mit.edu>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 09:56:09AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 04:11:22PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > The problem is due to remove-do_blk_alloc patch.
> >
> > The patch below should fix the crash.
> >
> > - EXT4_I(inode)->i_allocated_meta_blocks += *count;
> > + EXT4_I(inode)->i_allocated_meta_blocks += ar.len;
>
>
> Good catch, thanks. I'll add it to the patch queue.
>
> > I have one question regarding the patch. What about blocks allocated for
> > directories for the ext3 format. With extent format we are not
> > setting EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA for non regular files. So i guess we also
> > need the below patch .
>
> One of the good things about getting rid of too many layers of
> abstractions is that it makes bugs like this easier to spot. We've
> been sending allocating directory and symlinks using EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA
> if extents haven't been enabled, and no one noticed before we
> simplified out things....
We had always sent the directory allocation request with
EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA not set. With Linus kernel I have this
671 static ext4_fsblk_t do_blk_alloc(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
.....
....
686 if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !(flags & EXT4_META_BLOCK))
687 /* enable in-core preallocation for data block allocation */
688 ar.flags = EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA;
689 else
690 /* disable in-core preallocation for non-regular files */
691 ar.flags = 0;
That means if the request for block allocation is not on regular files
set ar.flags = 0; For regular files if the request is for meta-data
blocks set ar.glags = 0.
>
> Actually, I wonder if maybe we should set EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA for
> directories as well. Making directories contiguous does speed up
> certain workloads, and it does speed up fsck. It may be though that
> the mballoc algorithms should be tuned specifically for directories,
> and what we should do is to define a new flag, EXT4_MB_HINT_DIRECTORY,
> and pass it in for that case.
>
> Some experimentation is clearly called for, here....
>
True. But with the changes to do do_blk_alloc I guess we need to make
sure we request directories with EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA not set.
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-17 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-09 10:41 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000 [ext4_new_meta_blocks+0x7c/0xb7] Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-12-12 14:56 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-17 7:56 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2008-12-17 11:47 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-17 16:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-12-18 8:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-01-02 5:08 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081217075635.GA7685@skywalker \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).