From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Don't overwrite allocation_context ac_status
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:24:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081217085410.GB7685@skywalker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081212175922.GC26085@mit.edu>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:59:22PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 06:37:43PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > We can call ext4_mb_check_limits even after successfull
> > allocation. Make sure we don't overwrite ac_status.
> > This fix the below lockdep warning
>
> So the ext4_mb_check_limits() function isn't that well documented, but
> one of the things it is supposed to do is to make sure that blocks
> comprising the extent that was found is in fact still available. This
> check patches this out. Are we sure this does the right thing?
ext4_mb_check_limits does allocation in complex_scan. In complex scan
we loop through available free blocks and try to find the best extent.
We also want to make sure we doesn't loop too much. So
ext4_mb_check_limits and ext4_mb_measure_extent does multiple things.
Now what we do in complex_scan is
for blocks in group:
ext4_mb_find_extent();
ext4_mb_measure_extents()
ext4_mb_check_limits(..., 1);
Now ext4_mb_measure_extents() can result in successfull
allocation. So we need to make sure we don't do further allocation in
ext4_mb_check_limits when we call ext4_mb_check_limits later with
finish_group = 1;
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-17 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-10 13:07 [PATCH] ext4: Don't overwrite allocation_context ac_status Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-12-12 17:59 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-17 8:54 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2009-01-02 5:23 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081217085410.GB7685@skywalker \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).