From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ltt-dev] Fw: [PATCH] ext4: Add markers for better debuggability
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:19:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090110161906.GB20526@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090109185840.GD23869@mit.edu>
* Theodore Tso (tytso@mit.edu) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:49:01AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >
> > Given this is meant to be in the mainline kernel, using tracepoints
> > rather than markers would be more appropriate. Please see
> > Documentation/tracepoints.txt and samples/tracepoints/ for details.
>
> I saw that, but I'm still not sure how I would actually *use*
> tracepoints. I can use markers today with Systemtap, and I need an
> easy way to be able to selectively do things like "trap and print all
> of the logged data when the ext4_request_inode tracepoint/marker is
> tripped where dev=='dm-8'".
>
> Unfortunately, Systemtap seems doomed given its current course and
> direction, so I'm not opposed to moving to another solution --- I just
> need a HOWTO that demonstrates how I can do this painlessly and
> easily; preferably without having me have to manually hack up a kernel
> module each time I want to implement the tracing
>
> Is there an easy way to do that using ltt today? Can you point me at
> a sample of how this could be done?
>
Hi Ted,
I just ported LTTng to 2.6.28 yesterday and started doing the port of
ext4/jbd2 to tracepoints. As you can see in my 0.74 announcement, the
tracepoint work for both jbd2 and ext4 is done. I also did the lttng
probe module for jbd2. Now I just have to create the probe module for
ext4. I also want to create debugfs files to control per-probe module
filtering, e.g. :
/mnt/debugfs/ltt/filter/jbd2/dev
/mnt/debugfs/ltt/filter/ext4/dev
Where writing to it would add device names to the filter list. I would
like a scheme where we can easily add/remove devices, list all
devices... I think ftrace already has something similar for
instrumentation activation.
The main question I am facing is : What interface semantic do we want
for such filter control file ?
Comments/ideas are welcome.
Mathieu
> - Ted
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-10 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090109170408.75C1.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
2009-01-09 14:49 ` [ltt-dev] Fw: [PATCH] ext4: Add markers for better debuggability Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-09 18:58 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-10 16:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-01-10 18:42 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-10 20:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-10 21:50 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-12 1:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-10 18:19 ` LTTng for ext4 tracing HOWTO Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090110161906.GB20526@Krystal \
--to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).