From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:40:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090114044059.GA6222@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496D526D.1010402@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:48:13AM +0000, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> Well, Arjan's commit, efaee192: "async: make the final inode deletion
>> an asynchronous event", does change how inodes get deleted, and this
>> looks like a race where an inode is getting deleted during the umount.
>>
>> So I would try reverting commit efaee192 and see if it fixes things
>> before starting a full bisect...
>
> the commit is already reverted before rc1
>
Ah, right. I see, the async infrastructure is still in fs/super.c,
but the actual code to insert deleted inodes onto the s_async_list was
removed in commit b32714b. Sorry, that confused me.
OK, so assuming that Venkatesh was using something post-rc1, I can't
suggest anything other than a full bisect. Sorry....
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090110003645.GA16107@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
2009-01-14 0:48 ` kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428 Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 1:44 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-14 2:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-14 4:40 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2009-01-14 19:16 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-14 19:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-14 19:38 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-14 19:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-14 19:48 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-14 21:20 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-21 20:10 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-24 7:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 16:39 ` Darren Hart
2009-01-26 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 17:12 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090114044059.GA6222@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).