From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: e2fsprogs w/64-bit patches: make check gets one failure Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:02:10 -0600 Message-ID: <20090312040210.GQ3199@webber.adilger.int> References: <12304.1236797612@alphaville.usa.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Nick Dokos Return-path: Received: from sca-es-mail-1.Sun.COM ([192.18.43.132]:42373 "EHLO sca-es-mail-1.sun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750754AbZCLECZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:02:25 -0400 Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n2C42Nx4003590 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Content-disposition: inline Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-5.01 64bit (built Feb 19 2009)) id <0KGD00700KE62G00@fe-sfbay-10.sun.com> for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:02:23 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <12304.1236797612@alphaville.usa.hp.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mar 11, 2009 14:53 -0400, Nick Dokos wrote: > I followed the workflow that Ted described in the following message: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=123367642710241&w=2 > > with the patch series from git://github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs-64bit.git > > With all the patches in the series file applied, make check gives > me the following error: > > ... > f_h_reindex: reindex HTREE Directory with different hash seed: failed > ... > 100 tests succeeded 1 tests failed > make[1]: *** [check] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/nick/src/e2fsprogs/standard/build/tests' > make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 Including the content of the tests/f_h_reindex.failed file might make the problem obvious. Possibly it is just some change in the output format that is causing expect to fail. > I bisected the series and found that the culprit seems to be > > 0024-Miscellaneous-e2fsck-related-64-bit-fixes.patch > > Unfortunately, a bunch of later patches don't apply cleanly without > this one, so the most complete series file that does not get the > error is the following - uncommenting 0024 gives the error: Well, "make check" should pass after every patch in the series, so the fact that later ones do not pass is irrelevant. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.