linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] fs: Avoid data corruption with blocksize < pagesize
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:00:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090318120022.GB14622@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1237311235-13623-4-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 06:33:54PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Assume the following situation:
> Filesystem with blocksize < pagesize - suppose blocksize = 1024,
> pagesize = 4096. File 'f' has first four blocks already allocated.
> (line with "state:" contains the state of buffers in the page - m = mapped,
> u = uptodate, d = dirty)
> 
>   process 1:                       process 2:
> 
> write to 'f' bytes 0 - 1024
>   state: |mud,-,-,-|, page dirty
>                                    write to 'f' bytes 1024 - 4096:
>                                      __block_prepare_write() maps blocks
>                                        state: |mud,m,m,m|, page dirty
>                                      we fail to copy data -> copied = 0
>                                      block_write_end() does nothing
>                                      page gets unlocked
> writepage() is called on the page
>   block_write_full_page() writes buffers with garbage
> 
> This patch fixes the problem by skipping !uptodate buffers in
> block_write_full_page().
> 
> CC: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>  fs/buffer.c |    7 ++++++-
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 9f69741..22c0144 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -1774,7 +1774,12 @@ static int __block_write_full_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page,
>  	} while (bh != head);
>  
>  	do {
> -		if (!buffer_mapped(bh))
> +		/*
> +		 * Parallel write could have already mapped the buffers but
> +		 * it then had to restart before copying in new data. We
> +		 * must avoid writing garbage so just skip the buffer.
> +		 */
> +		if (!buffer_mapped(bh) || !buffer_uptodate(bh))
>  			continue;

I don't quite see how this can happen. Further down in this loop,
we do a test_clear_buffer_dirty(), which should exclude this I
think? And marking the buffer dirty if it is not uptodate should
be a bug.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-18 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-17 17:33 [PATCH 0/4] Fix bugs and possible data corruption if blocksize < pagesize Jan Kara
2009-03-17 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] ext3: Fix false EIO errors Jan Kara
2009-03-17 17:33   ` [PATCH 2/4] ext3: Avoid " Jan Kara
2009-03-17 17:33     ` [PATCH 3/4] fs: Avoid data corruption with blocksize < pagesize Jan Kara
2009-03-17 17:33       ` [PATCH 4/4] fs: Warn about writing !uptodate buffers Jan Kara
2009-03-18 12:07         ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-18 12:00       ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2009-03-18 14:13         ` [PATCH 3/4] fs: Avoid data corruption with blocksize < pagesize Jan Kara
2009-03-18 18:57         ` Jan Kara
2009-03-18 18:42       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-03-18 18:50         ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090318120022.GB14622@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).