From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
jack@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext3: Use WRITE_SYNC for commits which are caused by fsync()
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:20:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090327222017.GI31071@duck.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1238185471-31152-3-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu>
On Fri 27-03-09 16:24:30, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> If a commit is triggered by fsync(), set a flag indicating the journal
> blocks associated with the transaction should be flushed out using
> WRITE_SYNC.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
And this one seems fine as well. Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/jbd/commit.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
> fs/jbd/transaction.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/jbd.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd/commit.c b/fs/jbd/commit.c
> index 3fbffb1..f8077b9 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd/commit.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd/commit.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/pagemap.h>
> +#include <linux/bio.h>
>
> /*
> * Default IO end handler for temporary BJ_IO buffer_heads.
> @@ -171,14 +172,15 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(journal_t *journal,
> return (ret == -EIO);
> }
>
> -static void journal_do_submit_data(struct buffer_head **wbuf, int bufs)
> +static void journal_do_submit_data(struct buffer_head **wbuf, int bufs,
> + int write_op)
> {
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < bufs; i++) {
> wbuf[i]->b_end_io = end_buffer_write_sync;
> /* We use-up our safety reference in submit_bh() */
> - submit_bh(WRITE, wbuf[i]);
> + submit_bh(write_op, wbuf[i]);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -186,7 +188,8 @@ static void journal_do_submit_data(struct buffer_head **wbuf, int bufs)
> * Submit all the data buffers to disk
> */
> static int journal_submit_data_buffers(journal_t *journal,
> - transaction_t *commit_transaction)
> + transaction_t *commit_transaction,
> + int write_op)
> {
> struct journal_head *jh;
> struct buffer_head *bh;
> @@ -225,7 +228,7 @@ write_out_data:
> BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "needs blocking lock");
> spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
> /* Write out all data to prevent deadlocks */
> - journal_do_submit_data(wbuf, bufs);
> + journal_do_submit_data(wbuf, bufs, write_op);
> bufs = 0;
> lock_buffer(bh);
> spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
> @@ -256,7 +259,7 @@ write_out_data:
> jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
> if (bufs == journal->j_wbufsize) {
> spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
> - journal_do_submit_data(wbuf, bufs);
> + journal_do_submit_data(wbuf, bufs, write_op);
> bufs = 0;
> goto write_out_data;
> }
> @@ -286,7 +289,7 @@ write_out_data:
> }
> }
> spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
> - journal_do_submit_data(wbuf, bufs);
> + journal_do_submit_data(wbuf, bufs, write_op);
>
> return err;
> }
> @@ -315,6 +318,7 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
> int first_tag = 0;
> int tag_flag;
> int i;
> + int write_op = WRITE;
>
> /*
> * First job: lock down the current transaction and wait for
> @@ -347,6 +351,8 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
> spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
> commit_transaction->t_state = T_LOCKED;
>
> + if (commit_transaction->t_synchronous_commit)
> + write_op = WRITE_SYNC;
> spin_lock(&commit_transaction->t_handle_lock);
> while (commit_transaction->t_updates) {
> DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> @@ -431,7 +437,8 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
> * Now start flushing things to disk, in the order they appear
> * on the transaction lists. Data blocks go first.
> */
> - err = journal_submit_data_buffers(journal, commit_transaction);
> + err = journal_submit_data_buffers(journal, commit_transaction,
> + write_op);
>
> /*
> * Wait for all previously submitted IO to complete.
> @@ -660,7 +667,7 @@ start_journal_io:
> clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
> set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> bh->b_end_io = journal_end_buffer_io_sync;
> - submit_bh(WRITE, bh);
> + submit_bh(write_op, bh);
> }
> cond_resched();
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd/transaction.c b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
> index e6a1174..ed886e6 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd/transaction.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
> @@ -1440,6 +1440,8 @@ int journal_stop(handle_t *handle)
> }
> }
>
> + if (handle->h_sync)
> + transaction->t_synchronous_commit = 1;
> current->journal_info = NULL;
> spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
> spin_lock(&transaction->t_handle_lock);
> diff --git a/include/linux/jbd.h b/include/linux/jbd.h
> index 64246dc..2c69431 100644
> --- a/include/linux/jbd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/jbd.h
> @@ -552,6 +552,11 @@ struct transaction_s
> */
> int t_handle_count;
>
> + /*
> + * This transaction is being forced and some process is
> + * waiting for it to finish.
> + */
> + int t_synchronous_commit:1;
> };
>
> /**
> --
> 1.5.6.3
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-27 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 20:24 [PATCH 0/3] Ext3 latency improvement patches Theodore Ts'o
2009-03-27 20:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] block_write_full_page: Use synchronous writes for WBC_SYNC_ALL writebacks Theodore Ts'o
2009-03-27 20:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext3: Use WRITE_SYNC for commits which are caused by fsync() Theodore Ts'o
2009-03-27 20:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext3: Avoid starting a transaction in writepage when not necessary Theodore Ts'o
2009-03-27 22:23 ` Jan Kara
2009-03-27 23:03 ` Theodore Tso
2009-03-30 13:22 ` Jan Kara
2009-03-27 22:20 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2009-03-27 20:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] block_write_full_page: Use synchronous writes for WBC_SYNC_ALL writebacks Jan Kara
2009-04-07 6:21 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-07 6:50 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-07 7:08 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-07 7:17 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-07 8:16 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-07 7:23 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-07 7:57 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-07 19:09 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-07 19:32 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-07 21:44 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-07 22:19 ` [PATCH] block_write_full_page: switch synchronous writes to use WRITE_SYNC_PLUG Theodore Tso
2009-04-07 23:09 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-07 23:46 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-08 8:08 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-08 22:34 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-09 17:59 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-08 6:00 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-08 15:26 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-08 5:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] block_write_full_page: Use synchronous writes for WBC_SYNC_ALL writebacks Jens Axboe
2009-04-08 15:25 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-07 14:19 ` Theodore Tso
2009-03-27 20:50 ` [PATCH 0/3] Ext3 latency improvement patches Chris Mason
2009-03-27 21:03 ` Chris Mason
2009-03-27 21:19 ` Jan Kara
2009-03-27 21:30 ` Theodore Tso
2009-03-27 21:54 ` Jan Kara
2009-03-27 23:09 ` Theodore Tso
2009-03-28 0:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-03-28 0:24 ` David Rees
2009-03-30 14:16 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-03-30 11:23 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
[not found] ` <20090330112330.GA11357@skywalker>
2009-03-30 11:44 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090327222017.GI31071@duck.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).