From: Valerie Aurora Henson <vaurora@redhat.com>
To: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][64-BIT] Miscellaneous e2fsprogs 64-bit patches - description
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:50:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090415195014.GB1668@shell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11629.1239227147@alphaville.usa.hp.com>
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 05:45:47PM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
> [I submitted the first three of these last week, but the first one,
> although the fix was correct (in the sense of fiddling with the correct
> bits), stylistically and from the point of code conventions and
> readability, was rather a botch. #2 and #3 are identical as patches but
> I fixed up parts of the commentary that were wrong or misleading. So I
> am reposting these as well as a couple of new ones. Please let me know
> if there are other problems of this sort. Thanks!]
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the testing and patches! I apologize for the delay in
replying; if it's any consolation, we were all at the Linux file
systems workshop when you sent this email.
All the patches look good to me (and I will ACK them individually). I
pulled them into my shared-64bit branch at:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=fs/ext2/val/e2fsprogs.git;a=summary
> P.S. Here is an interesting side issue:
>
> Patch 3 mentions that e2image ran to completion after the patch was applied
> (btw, in addition to the 16TiB file, the fs contains a directory with about
> 10^7 zero length files):
>
> # time e2image -r /dev/mapper/bigvg-bigvol /dev/null
> e2image 1.41.4-shared-64bit (27-Jan-2009)
>
> real 37m18.991s
> user 15m21.148s
> sys 17m57.151s
>
> but there is an interesting catch-22: how do I save its output?
>
> I can try the command line suggested in the manual page:
>
> e2image -r <dev> - | bzip2 > image.bz2
>
> but it takes forever: I started a run on Saturday and it was not
> done by Tuesday when I killed it - writing to the pipe at 4096 bytes
> a pop is very slow.
>
> Or I can forego the compression and try to save to a file: it's sparse
> (I only used 7GiB before it failed), but its nominal size exceeded the
> maximum file size limit on ext4, at which point I start getting lseek
> failures.
The 16TB limit on ext4 files is an enormous pain for testing 64-bit
(>= 16TB) file systems. I keep intending to write some simple dm
setup to concatenate two loopback files together, but instead I always
install XFS and create a loopback file on an XFS partition.
-VAL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-15 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-08 21:45 [PATCH 0/5][64-BIT] Miscellaneous e2fsprogs 64-bit patches - description Nick Dokos
2009-04-15 19:50 ` Valerie Aurora Henson [this message]
2009-04-15 19:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-04-15 22:16 ` Valerie Aurora Henson
2009-04-16 0:31 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-15 21:51 ` Nick Dokos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090415195014.GB1668@shell \
--to=vaurora@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicholas.dokos@hp.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).