From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blkid: add --disable-libblkid (v2)
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:49:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090422134945.GQ15541@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240407745.2902.3.camel@wing-commander>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 02:42:25PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>
> Obviously this doesn't solve the debian/control problem - that would
> require generating it with/without the libblkid parts depending on
> target distro.
One of the things I need to look at, but maybe you know off-hand, is
whether the debian/rules can safely modify debian/control file. I
haven't looked deeply into the underbelly of how dpkg-buildpackage and
its descendents work to know whether or not that can be done safely.
If not, we might have to have a separate shell script which is run
manually that adjusts debian/control and debian/rules file. That
would be annoying/unfortunate, but doable.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-22 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-23 17:38 uti-linux-ng libblkid Karel Zak
2009-02-23 17:38 ` [PATCH] blkid: add --disable-libblkid to build with external libblkid Karel Zak
2009-02-24 8:44 ` [PATCH] blkid: add --disable-libblkid (v2) Karel Zak
2009-03-24 12:11 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-04-16 10:22 ` Karel Zak
2009-04-17 13:36 ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-17 13:48 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-04-22 13:33 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-22 13:42 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-04-22 13:49 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2009-04-22 14:07 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-04-29 17:22 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-04-29 20:54 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-05 11:30 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-04-27 9:21 ` Karel Zak
2009-04-28 20:36 ` Karel Zak
2009-04-29 13:59 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-04-29 17:17 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-29 20:23 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-30 8:28 ` Karel Zak
2009-02-23 17:38 ` [PATCH] tune2fs: make findfs code optional Karel Zak
2009-03-09 1:08 ` uti-linux-ng libblkid Theodore Tso
2009-03-09 10:42 ` Karel Zak
2009-03-09 11:45 ` Karel Zak
2009-03-18 19:28 ` Karel Zak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090422134945.GQ15541@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scott@ubuntu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).