From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext4_ext_check_inode: bad header/extent in inode
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:09:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090424200946.GT3209@webber.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090424115816.GC7949@mit.edu>
On Apr 24, 2009 07:58 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> It didn't; what had happened was that a garbage block had got written
> into the inode table. This caused the kernel to complain about
> eh_magic being wrong in the inode table. E2fsck 1.41.3 fixed those
> problems, but it ignored i_file_acl_high because the 64 bit feature
> flag was not set. The kernel always pays attention to
> i_file_acl_high, regardless of whether the 64-bit feature flag is set
> or not. Hence, the kernel was complaining and refused to touch those
> inodes.
>
> In any case, with e2fsck 1.41.5, I added code to fix i_file_acl_high
> getting set, and I was then able to mount the raw e2image file and not
> have any problems accessing the files in question, so I'm pretty sure
> that was the problem.
This sounds like another case for the "inode badness" patch that we've
developed, as it allows e2fsck to detect that the inode is just full of
garbage and clear the whole thing, instead of fixing it piecemeal and
leaving the sanitized garbage behind.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-24 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-23 12:15 ext4_ext_check_inode: bad header/extent in inode Christian Kujau
2009-04-23 12:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-04-23 19:04 ` Christian Kujau
2009-04-23 20:40 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-23 22:15 ` Christian Kujau
2009-04-24 3:20 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-24 7:09 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-04-24 11:58 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-24 20:09 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2009-04-24 8:57 ` Christian Kujau
2009-04-24 9:40 ` Christian Kujau
2009-04-24 12:00 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-24 12:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-04-24 12:42 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-04-24 20:21 ` Christian Kujau
2009-04-24 20:34 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-04-24 20:59 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-24 22:54 ` [PATCH] ext4: Do not try to validate extents on special files Theodore Ts'o
2009-04-24 21:02 ` ext4_ext_check_inode: bad header/extent in inode Christian Kujau
2009-04-24 21:23 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-04-24 20:41 ` Christian Kujau
2009-04-23 20:51 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090424200946.GT3209@webber.adilger.int \
--to=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@nerdbynature.de \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).