From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4/jbd2: remove stray markers Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:18:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20090506131824.GB1325@elte.hu> References: <20090506104436.GA24047@lst.de> <20090506110354.GG25203@elte.hu> <20090506114051.GA4964@mit.edu> <20090506114415.GA26947@lst.de> <20090506125552.GD4964@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Theodore Tso , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fr?d?ric Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , linux-ext4 Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:53078 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753559AbZEFNSj (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 09:18:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090506125552.GD4964@mit.edu> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Theodore Tso wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:44:15PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 07:40:51AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > > > My complaint with Cristoph's > > > > Christoph, still :) > > Sorry, I keep making that mistake! Keep calling me on it, and > eventually I'll reprogram those finger macros. :-) > > > > Also without Steve's updates you can't actually use them in a module. > > Yep; not sure *how* critical that would be for -next, though. > Probably there would be some complaints.... > > In any case, it'll be less work to worry about patch conflicts if > we just do it during the merge window. If we can just arrange to > push the tip/tracing changes early, I'll push the marker > replacement patches as soon as I see them hit mainline. Cool, thanks! I'll try to aim for an early merge of the tracing tree. (And such dependent patches are generally possible shortly after -rc1 as well, especially if the clean-up factor is significant.) Ingo