linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.31] ext4: Mark the unwritten buffer_head mapped during write_begin
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 07:49:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090511114913.GA6347@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241693429-27588-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:20:29PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> This avoid multiple get_block calls during write. Now that we have
> unwritten buffer marked as mapped, we need to make sure writepages
> will handle unwritten buffer_heads also.
> 
> With this patch we have the below:
> 
> ext4_ext_get_block returns unmapped, unwritten, buffer head when called with
> create = 0 for prealloc space. This make sure we handle the read path and non
> delalloc case correctly.  Even though the buffer head is marked unmapped we
> have valid b_blocknr and b_bdev values in the buffer_head.
> 
> ext4_da_get_block_prep called for block resrevation will now return mapped,
> unwritten, new buffer_head for prealloc space. This make sure we don't do
> multiple get_block calls for write to same offset. Also marking it new make
> sure sub-block zeroing of buffered writes happen correctly.

Can you clarify this patch description.  Is this only about avoiding
multiple calls to get_block_*(), or does this also fix some potential
filesystem corruption bugs?  And how does this fit in with the other
patches you've submitted?

Thanks,

							- Ted


  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-11 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-07 10:50 [PATCH for 2.6.31] ext4: Mark the unwritten buffer_head mapped during write_begin Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-11 11:49 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2009-05-12 15:19 ` [PATCH -V2 " Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090511114913.GA6347@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).