From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.31] ext4: Mark the unwritten buffer_head mapped during write_begin
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 07:49:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090511114913.GA6347@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241693429-27588-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:20:29PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> This avoid multiple get_block calls during write. Now that we have
> unwritten buffer marked as mapped, we need to make sure writepages
> will handle unwritten buffer_heads also.
>
> With this patch we have the below:
>
> ext4_ext_get_block returns unmapped, unwritten, buffer head when called with
> create = 0 for prealloc space. This make sure we handle the read path and non
> delalloc case correctly. Even though the buffer head is marked unmapped we
> have valid b_blocknr and b_bdev values in the buffer_head.
>
> ext4_da_get_block_prep called for block resrevation will now return mapped,
> unwritten, new buffer_head for prealloc space. This make sure we don't do
> multiple get_block calls for write to same offset. Also marking it new make
> sure sub-block zeroing of buffered writes happen correctly.
Can you clarify this patch description. Is this only about avoiding
multiple calls to get_block_*(), or does this also fix some potential
filesystem corruption bugs? And how does this fit in with the other
patches you've submitted?
Thanks,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-11 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-07 10:50 [PATCH for 2.6.31] ext4: Mark the unwritten buffer_head mapped during write_begin Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-11 11:49 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2009-05-12 15:19 ` [PATCH -V2 " Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090511114913.GA6347@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).